[Reviewers: arbiters or consultants?].

F. Naccarella

1993-07-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Community characteristics affecting emergency department use by Medicaid enrollees

Robert A Lowe,Rongwei Fu,Emerson T Ong,Paul B McGinnis,Lyle J Fagnan,Nancy Vuckovic,Charles Gallia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181844e1c

Abstract:Objectives: In seeking to identify modifiable, system-level factors affecting emergency department (ED) use, we used a statewide Medicaid database to study community variation in ED use and ascertain community characteristics associated with higher use. Methods: This historical cohort study used administrative data from July 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004. Residence ZIP codes were used to assign all 555,219 Medicaid enrollees to 130 primary care service areas (PCSAs). PCSA characteristics studied included rural/urban status, presence of hospital(s), driving time to hospital, and several measures of primary care capacity. Statistical analyses used a 2-stage model. In the first stage (enrollee level), ED utilization rates adjusted for enrollee demographics and medical conditions were calculated for each PCSA. In the second stage (community level), a mixed effects linear model was used to determine the association between PCSA characteristics and ED use. Results: ED utilization rates varied more than 20-fold among the PCSAs. Compared with PCSAs with primary care capacity less than need, PCSAs with capacity 1 to 2 times the need had 0.12 (95% CI: -0.044, -0.20) fewer ED visits/person/yr. Compared with PCSAs with the nearest hospital accessible within 10 minutes, PCSAs with the nearest hospital >30 minutes' drive had 0.26 (95% CI: -0.38, -0.13) fewer ED visits/person/yr. Conclusions: Within this Medicaid population, ED utilization was determined not only by patient characteristics but by community characteristics. Better understanding of system-level factors affecting ED use can enable communities to improve their health care delivery systems-augmenting access to care and reducing reliance on EDs.
Delivery system emergency department capacity and its effect on nonsystem service utilization

Kertu Tenso,Steven Pizer,Sivagaminathan Palani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14694

Abstract:Background: Emergency department (ED) use is often seen as a source of excess health care spending, prompting managers to limit ED capacity in their health systems. However, if limited ED capacity in a delivery system leads patients to seek emergency care elsewhere, then health care quality and efficient management may be compromised within the system. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the effect of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in-house ED clinician capacity on VHA community care (CC) ED claims. Methods: We used administrative data from the VHA to identify CC ED claims and Department of Veterans Affairs emergency physician (EP) capacity for 2014-2019. We used quasi-experimental instrumental variables approach with two different instruments: percent weekday federal holidays and VHA EP full-time equivalents (FTEs). We controlled for VHA ED variables such as ED wait times (door to triage, door to doctor, and door to admission) and demand variables such as alternative insurance coverage, driving time to VHA care, and demographic variables (employment, age, household income, race, gender, and VHA priority status). Results: After instrumenting for capacity with percent weekday federal holidays, we found that one clinic-day capacity (one 8-h ED shift) per 10,000 enrollees increase at the VHA ED will result in a reduction of 61 CC ED claims per 10,000 enrollees. After instrumenting for capacity with EP FTE, we found that one clinic-day capacity (one 8-h ED shift) per 10,000 enrollees increase at the VHA ED will result in a reduction of 48 CC ED claims per 10,000 enrollees. Both of these results are statistically significant at p < 0.001. Conclusions: Our findings imply that offering more in-house ED care, in the form of clinician capacity, can substantially reduce out-of-system ED use. The results may be of interest to integrated health care system managers who prefer their patients to stay within network.
Primary Care Enhanced Access Services and the Association With Nonurgent Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization and Child Opportunity Index

Mark Ryan Hincapie,Montserrat A. Corbera-Hincapie,Srinivasan Suresh,Kaila Alston,Gabriella Butler,Anthony Fabio,Kristin N. Ray

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003213

2024-05-09

Pediatric Emergency Care

Abstract:Objectives This study aims to examine the association between primary care practice characteristics (enhanced access services) and practice-level rates of nonurgent emergency department (ED) visits using ED and practice-level data. Survey data suggest that enhanced access services within a child's primary care practice may be associated with reduced nonurgent ED visits. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of nonurgent ED visits to a tertiary pediatric hospital in Western Pennsylvania with nearly 85,000 annual ED visits. We obtained patient encounter data of all nonurgent pediatric ED (PED) visits between January 2018 and December 2019. We identified the primary care provider at the time of the study period. For each of the 42 included offices, we determined the number of unique children in the office with a nonurgent PED visit, allowing us to determine the percentage of children in the practice with such a visit during the study period. We then stratified the 42 offices into low, intermediate, and high tertiles of nonurgent PED use. Using Kruskal-Wallis tests, logistic regression, and Pearson χ 2 tests, we compared practice characteristics, enhanced access services, practice location Child Opportunity Index 2.0, and PED visit diagnoses across tertiles. Results We examined 52,459 nonurgent PED encounters by 33,209 unique patients across 42 outpatient offices. Primary care practices in the lowest ED visit tertile were more likely to have 4 or more evenings with office hours (36% vs 14%, P = 0.04), 4 or more evenings of weekday extended hours (43% vs 14%, P = 0.05), and at least 1 day of any weekend hours (86% vs 29%, P = 0.01), compared with practices in other tertiles. High PED use tertile offices were also associated with lower Child Opportunity Index scores. Conclusions Primary care offices with higher nonurgent PED utilization had fewer enhanced access services and were located in neighborhood with fewer child-focused resources.

pediatrics,emergency medicine
Hospital Capabilities Associated With Behavioral Health Integration Within Emergency Departments

Linh N. Bui,Margae Knox,Chris Miller-Rosales,Ellen Meara,Hector P. Rodriguez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001973

2024-01-17

Medical Care

Abstract:Objectives: To identify hospital capabilities associated with behavioral health (BH) processes in emergency departments (EDs). Research Design: Six hundred two hospital responses to the 2017/2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems were linked to 2017 American Hospital Association Annual Survey data. Separate multivariable regressions estimated how hospital capabilities (the use of quality improvement methods, approaches to disseminate best patient-care practices, barriers to using care delivery innovations, and inpatient beds for psychiatric or substance use) were associated with each of 4 ED-based BH processes: mental health and substance use disorder screening, team-based approaches to BH, telepsychiatry, and direct referrals to community-based BH clinicians. Models controlled for hospital structural characteristics and area-level socioeconomic factors. Results: Most hospitals screened for BH conditions and provided direct referrals to community-based BH clinicians. Approximately half of the hospitals used a team approach to BH. A minority had implemented telepsychiatry. Each additional process used to disseminate best patient-care practices was associated with more screening for BH conditions (an increase of 4.07 points on the screening index, P <0.01) and greater likelihood of using a team approach to BH [4.41 percentage point ( P <0.01) increase]. Hospitals reporting more barriers to the use of care delivery innovations reported less screening and use of a team approach [a decrease of 0.15 points on the screening index ( P <0.01) and 0.28 percentage points reduction in likelihood of team approach use ( P <0.001) for 1-point increase in the barrier index]. Conclusions: Research and interventions focused on removing innovation barriers or adding processes to disseminate best practices offer a path to accelerate BH integration in hospital EDs.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Assessing Association Between Team Structure and Health Outcome and Cost by Social Network Analysis

Yong-Fang Kuo,Pooja Agrawal,Lin-Na Chou,Daniel Jupiter,Mukaila A Raji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16962

2020-12-01

Abstract:Background/objective: To assess the impact of team structure composition and degree of collaboration among various providers on process and outcomes of primary care. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Data from 20% randomly selected primary care service areas in the 2015 Medicare claims were used to identify primary care practices. Participants: 449,460 patients with diabetes, heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cared for by the identified primary care practices. Measurements: Social network analysis measures, including edge density, degree centralization, and betweenness centralization for each practice. Results: When compared with practices with MDs and nurse practitioners (NPs) or/and physicians assistants (PAs), the practices with MDs had only lower degree of centralization and higher MD-to-MD connectedness. Within the primary care practices comprising MDs, NPs, or/and PAs, the nonphysician providers were more connected (measured as edge density) to all providers in the practice but with higher degree of centralization compared with the MDs in the practice. After adjusting for patient characteristics and type of practice, higher edge density was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (odds ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.79-0.99), emergency department (ER) admission (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.70-0.92), and total spending (cost ratio (CR) = 0.86, standard error of the mean (SE) = 0.038). Conversely, higher degree centralization was associated with higher rates of hospitalization (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03-1.28), ER admission (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.08-1.40), and total spending (CR = 1.14, SE = 0.037). However, higher degree centralization was associated with lower rates of potentially inappropriate medications (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.81-0.99). Team leadership by an NP versus an MD was similar in the rate of ER admissions, hospitalizations, or total spending. Conclusion: Our findings showed that highly connected primary care practices with high collaborative care and less top-down MD-centered authority have lower odds of hospitalization, fewer ER admissions, and less total spending; findings likely reflecting better communication and more coordinated care of older patients.
Why Do Patients Opt for the Emergency Department over Other Care Choices? A Multi-Hospital Analysis

Charles W. Stube,Alexander S. Ljungberg,Jason A. Borton,Kunal Chadha,Kyle J. Kelleran,E. Brooke Lerner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.18647

2024-09-27

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Introduction: There are several options for receiving acute care besides emergency departments (ED), such as primary care physician (PCP) offices, urgent care centers (UCC), and telehealth services. It is unknown whether these alternative modes of care have decreased the number of ED visits for patients or whether they are considered before visiting the ED. A comprehensive study considering all potential methods of care is needed to address the evolving landscape of healthcare. Our goal was to identify any factors or barriers that may have influenced a patient's choice to visit the ED as opposed to a UCC, PCP, another local ED, or use telehealth services. Methods: We surveyed ED patients between three hospital sites in the greater Buffalo, NY, area. The survey consisted of questions regarding the patients' reasons and rationale for choosing the ED over the alternative care options. The study also involved a health record review of the patients' diagnoses, tests/procedures, consults, and final disposition after completion of the survey. Results: Of the 590 patients consented and surveyed, 152 (25.7%) considered seeking care at a UCC, 18 (3.1%) considered telehealth services, and 146 (24.7%) attempted to contact their PCP. On the recommendation of their PCP, patients presented to the ED 110 (20.7%) times and on the recommendation of the clinician at the UCC 54 (9.2%) times. Patients' perceived seriousness of their condition was the most common reason for their selected mode of transport to the ED and reason for choosing the ED as opposed to alternative care sites (PCP, UCC, telehealth). Based on criteria for an avoidable ED visit, 83 (14.1%) ED patients met these criteria. Conclusion: Individuals prioritize the perceived severity of their condition when deciding where to seek emergency care. While some considered alternatives (PCP, UCC, telehealth services), uncertainties about their condition and recommendations from other clinicians led many to opt for ED care. Our findings suggest a potential gap in understanding the severity of symptoms and determining the most suitable place to seek medical care for these particular conditions.

emergency medicine
Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration and Care Utilization: Implications for Patient Outcome and Healthcare Resource Use

Daniel D. Maeng,Ellen Poleshuck,Tziporah Rosenberg,Amie Kulak,Thomas Mahoney,George Nasra,Hochang B. Lee,Yue Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07372-6

IF: 5.7

2022-02-07

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract:BackgroundBehavioral health (BH) integration in primary care (PC) can potentially improve outcomes and reduce cost of care. While different models of integration exist, evidence from real-world examples is needed to demonstrate the effectiveness and value of integration. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of six PC practice sites located in Western New York that implemented a primary care behavioral health (PCBH) integration model.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of PCBH on all-cause healthcare utilization rates.DesignA retrospective observational study based on historical multi-payer health insurance claims data. Claims data were aggregated on a per-member-per-month basis to compare utilization rates among the patients in the PC practice sites that had implemented PCBH to those in the sites that had not yet done so.ParticipantsThe sample included 6768 unique adult health plan members between October 2015 and June 2017 with at least one BH diagnosis code who were attributed to one of the six newly integrated PC practice sites.InterventionsUnder the PCBH integration model, BH specialists were embedded in PC practice sites to treat a wide range of BH conditions.Main MeasuresRates of all-cause ED visits and hospital admissions, along with rates of PC provider and BH provider visits.Key ResultsPCBH implementation was associated with reductions in the rates of outpatient ED visits (14.2%; p < 0.001) and PC provider visits (12.0%; p < 0.001), as well as with an increased rate of BH provider visits (7.5%; p = 0.018).ConclusionsPCBH integration appears to alter the treatment patterns among patients with BH conditions by shifting patient visits away from ED and PC providers toward BH providers who specialize in treatment of such patients.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
Reasons for High Emergency Department Use Among Patients With Common Mental Disorders or Substance-Related Disorders

Karine-MichÈle Dion,Francine Ferland,Lambert Farand,Lise Gauvin,Marie-JosÉe Fleury

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2024.27333

Abstract:Aims: This study examined the reasons for high emergency department (ED) use among patients with common mental disorders (MDs), substance-related disorders (SRDs) or co-occurring MDs-SRDs. Method: Following content analysis, 42 high ED users (three-plus visits/year) recruited in two Quebec EDs were interviewed. Results: The reasons included barriers to outpatient care, patient disabilities and professional practices. Patients with SRDs trust outpatient services less, those with MDs had important unmet needs and those with MDs-SRDs faced care coordination issues. Conclusion: Improvements such as ED use monitoring, consolidating MD-SRD practices and continuous training are needed in EDs and outpatient services to enhance access and continuity of care.
Better Care, Same Cost - Reducing Unplanned Care for Multi-visit Patients: A Payer-Provider Model

Janel Hanmer,Yushu Liu,Anita Leon-Jhong,Thuy Bui,Avery Meltzer,Jane Kogan,James Schuster,Gary S Fischer,Jodie Bryk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09006-z

2024-09-03

Abstract:Importance: Many interventions implemented for multi-visit patients (MVP) have been developed to address patient-centric needs of these individuals and reduce unplanned care for ambulatory-sensitive conditions. More rigorous research is needed to better understand the impact of these interventions on changes in care utilization including unplanned care. Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Enhanced Care Program (ECP), a payer-provider collaborative model, on unplanned care use and cost of care. Design: Using propensity methods, a comparison group was constructed using insurer membership files. Comparisons were performed using a difference-in-differences analysis. Participants: Patients enrolled in ECP through December 2019 were considered eligible for the study (n = 357). All patients had five or more ED visits in the past year or two or more inpatient hospitalizations in the past year prior to enrollment. Exposures: ECP is a high-intensity outpatient intervention intended to reduce avoidable unplanned care such as ED visits and inpatient hospital stays through home visits, chronic/acute disease management, and intensive care coordination. Main measures: The primary outcomes of interest were events per 100 members per year of ED use with return to home, unplanned inpatient and observational status admissions, and unplanned behavioral health inpatient admission, and cost of care per member per month. Key results: Overall total unplanned care encounters were significantly reduced with a difference-in-difference of 320 unplanned care encounters per 100 members per year in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The ECP group showed statistically significant decreases in costs of unplanned ED, unplanned observation admission, and unplanned inpatient behavioral medicine costs, but statistically significant increases in overall pharmacy costs and lab costs. Changes in total costs of care for the ECP group were not statistically different than the control group (p = 0.55). Conclusions: ECP showed significant reduction of unplanned care for MVP patients.
Importance of medical home domains on emergency visits using a cross-sectional national survey of US children

Mangala Rajan,Benjamin R Baer,Adina Scheinfeld,Erika L Abramson,Lisa Kern,Laura Pinheiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081533

IF: 3.006

2024-11-04

BMJ Open

Abstract:Background and objectives Receiving care at patient-centred medical homes (PCMH) is associated with reduced emergency department (ED) visits among children. Adverse social determinants of health (SDoH), such as lower socioeconomic status and household poverty, are associated with increased ED visits in children. The objective of this study is to use machine learning techniques to understand the relative importance of each PCMH component among different populations with adverse SDoH on the outcome of ED visits. Methods: design, setting and participants This study used the 2018–2019 pooled data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), an annual survey of parents and caregivers of US children from birth to 17 years. PCMH components were operationalised by classifying parent/caregiver responses into five domains: care coordination (CC), having a personal doctor or nurse, having a usual source of care, family-centred care and ease of getting referrals. SDoH included five categories: (1) social and community context, (2) economic stability, (3) education access and quality, (4) healthcare access and quality and (5) neighbourhood and built environment. Primary outcome measure We used a split-improvement variable importance measure based on random forests to determine the importance of PCMH domains on ED visits overall and stratified by SDoH. Results Overall, between 3% and 28% experienced one or more gaps in PCMH domains. Models show that problems with referrals (rank, 2; Gini, 83.5) and gaps in CC (rank, 3; Gini, 81.0) were the two most important domains of PCMH associated with ED visits in children. This result was consistent among black and Hispanic children and among children with lower socioeconomic status. Conclusions Our study findings underscore the importance of poor CC and referrals on ED visits for all children and those from disadvantaged populations. Initiatives for expanding the reach of PCMH should consider prioritising these two domains, especially in areas with significant minority populations.

medicine, general & internal
Health center use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 2012-2018

Brad Wright,Jill Akiyama,Andrew J Potter,Lindsay M Sabik,Grace G Stehlin,Amal N Trivedi,Fredric D Wolinsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13946

Abstract:Objective: To examine the relationship between federally qualified health center (FQHC) use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. Data sources: Data were obtained from 2012 to 2018 Medicare claims. Study design: We modeled hospital-based care as a function of FQHC use, person-level factors, a Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) indicator, and ZIP code fixed effects. Outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits (overall and nonemergent), observation stays, hospitalizations (overall and for ambulatory care sensitive conditions), and 30-day unplanned returns. We stratified all models on the basis of eligibility and rurality. Data extraction methods: Our sample included individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid for at least two full consecutive years, residing in a primary care service area with an FQHC. We excluded individuals without primary care visits, who died, or had end-stage renal disease. Principal findings: After the Medicare PPS was introduced, FQHC use in rural counties was associated with fewer ED and nonemergent ED visits per 100 person-years among both age-eligible (-14.8 [-17.5, -12.1]; -6.6 [-7.5, -5.6]) and disability-eligible duals (-11.3 [-14.4, -8.3]; -6 [-7.4, -4.6]) as well as a lower probability of observation stays (-0.8 pp age-eligible; -0.4 pp disability-eligible) and unplanned returns (-2.1 pp age-eligible; -1.9 pp disability-eligible). In urban counties, FQHC use was associated with more ED and nonemergent ED visits per 100 person-years (10.6 [8.4, 12.8]; 4.0 [2.6, 5.4]) among disability-eligible duals (a decrease of more than 60% compared with the pre-PPS period) and increases in the probability of hospitalization (1.1 pp age-eligible; 0.8 pp disability-eligible) and ACS hospitalization (0.5 pp age-eligible; 0.3 pp disability-eligible) (a decrease of roughly 50% compared with the pre-PPS period). Conclusions: FQHC use is associated with reductions in hospital-based care among dual enrollees after introduction of the Medicare PPS. Further research is needed to understand how FQHCs can tailor care to best serve this complex population.
Prediction of recovery in antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis.

K. O’Flynn,D. Gough,S. Gupta,M. Lewis,R. Postlethwaite

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-410X.1993.TB15997.X

1993-04-01

British Journal of Urology

Abstract:A series of 335 children with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis which persisted after the postnatal period was prospectively assessed. Idiopathic hydronephrosis (85 patients) and pelviureteric junction obstruction (73 patients) were the commonest conditions. All patients with idiopathic hydronephrosis were managed conservatively; 87% have had a complete resolution of hydronephrosis and 13% have remained unaltered. No patient managed conservatively has shown a deterioration in renal function.
The Safety and Effectiveness of On-Site Paramedic and Allied Health Treatment Interventions Targeting the Reduction of Emergency Department Visits by Long-Term Care Patients: Systematic Review

Shannon Leduc,Zach Cantor,Peter Kelly,Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy,George Wells,Christian Vaillancourt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2020.1794084

2020-07-20

Prehospital Emergency Care

Abstract:Programs that seek to avoid emergency department (ED) visits from patients residing in long-term care facilities are increasing. We sought to identify existing programs where allied healthcare personnel are the primary providers of the intervention and, to evaluate their effectiveness and safety.We systematically searched Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE with terms relating to long-term care, emergency services, hospitalization and allied health personnel. We reviewed 11,176 abstracts and included 22 studies in our narrative synthesis, which we grouped by intervention category.We found five categories of interventions including: 1) use of advanced practice nursing; 2) a program called Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers (INTERACT); 3) end-of-life care; 4) condition specific interventions; and 5) use of extended care paramedics. Among studies measuring that outcome, 13/13 reported a decrease in ED visits, and 16/17 reported a decrease hospitalization in the intervention groups. Patient adverse events such as functional status and relapse were seldom reported (6/22) as were measures of emergency system function such as crowding/inability of paramedics to transfer care to the ED (1/22). Only 4/22 studies evaluated patient mortality and 3/4 found a non-statistically significant worsening.We found five types of programs/interventions which all demonstrated a decrease in ED visits or hospitalization. However, most studies were observational and few assessed patient safety. Many identified programs focused on increased primary care for patients, and interventions addressing acute care issues, such as community paramedics, deserve more study.

public, environmental & occupational health,emergency medicine
[Aspergillus in the immunocompetent patient. Towards a new classification?].

B. Philippe,P. Germaud

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0761-8425(05)85625-6

IF: 0.714

2005-11-01

Revue des Maladies Respiratoires

Abstract:
Intensity of Social Needs Case Management Services and Changes in Hospital and Emergency Department Use Among Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries

Crystal Guo,Timothy T Brown,Hector P Rodriguez,Margae Knox,Mark D Fleming,Elizabeth A Hernandez,Daniel M Brown,Amanda L Brewster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002071

2024-12-01

Abstract:Objectives: We identify the association between high- and low-intensity case management services on hospital and emergency department (ED) use among CommunityConnect patients. Background: Social needs case management services vary in intensity, including the modality, workforce specialization, and maximum caseload. CommunityConnect is a social needs case management program implemented by Contra Costa Health, a county safety-net health system in California's San Francisco Bay Area. Methods: Due to the endogeneity of high-intensity services assigned to high-risk patients, we instrument for service intensity using the number of specialist case managers hired each month of enrollment. Zero-inflated negative binomial models with 2-stage residual inclusion estimated total and avoidable hospital admissions and ED visits 12 months post-enrollment for adult Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled between August 2017 and December 2018 (n = 19,782). Results: Compared with low-intensity case management, high-intensity services were associated with a reduction in the incidence rates of inpatient admissions [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.106-1.102; P = 0.072], ED visits (IRR = 0.608, 95% CI: 0.188-1.965; P = 0.058), and avoidable ED visits (IRR = 0.579, 95% CI: 0.179-1.872; P = 0.091). No significant association was found between service intensity and the likelihood of an event being an excess zero. Conclusions: High-intensity social needs case management may be more effective than low-intensity service at reducing health care use for individuals with non-zero use, suggesting that intensive case management may be especially helpful in supporting discharge and transitions of care.
Mental health care provision in community health centers and hospital emergency department utilization

Kathleen Carey,Megan B. Cole

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14283

2024-01-21

Health Services Research

Abstract:Objectives To examine whether community health centers (CHCs) are effective in offsetting mental health emergency department (ED) visits. Data Sources and Study Setting The HRSA Uniform Data System and the HCUP State ED Databases for Florida patients during 2012–2019. Study Design We identified CHC‐year‐specific service areas using patient origin zip codes. We then estimated panel data models for number of ED mental health visits per capita in a CHC's service area. Models measured CHC mental health utilization as number of visits, unique patients, and intensity (visits per patient). Principal Findings CHC mental health utilization increased approximately 100% during 2012–2019. Increased CHC mental health provision was associated with small reductions in ED mental health utilization. An annual increase of 1000 CHC mental health care visits (5%) was associated with 0.44% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.153), and an increase of 1000 CHC mental health care patients (15%) with 1.9% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.123). An increase of 1 annual mental health visit per patient was associated with 16% fewer ED mental health care visits (p = 0.011). Conclusions Results suggest that mental health provision in CHCs may reduce reliance on hospital EDs, albeit minimally. Policies that promote alignment of services between CHCs and local hospitals may accelerate this effect.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
A Bench Study of the Effects of Leak on Ventilator Performance During Noninvasive Ventilation

Yoshitoyo Ueno,N. Nakanishi,J. Oto,H. Imanaka,M. Nishimura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01145

2011-11-01

Respiratory Care

Abstract:BACKGROUND: During noninvasive ventilation (NIV), leak around the mask may cause inadequate ventilatory support or patient-ventilator asynchrony such as auto-triggering. Some NIV ventilators may be better than others at compensating for leak. METHODS: We bench studied 3 NIV ventilators (Vision, Carina, and Trilogy100) and 2 ICU ventilators (Puritan Bennett 840 and Evita XL) to assess how they coped with 2 leak levels and zero leak during NIV. With a 2-bellows-in-a-box lung model we simulated spontaneous breathing with tidal volumes of 300 mL and 500 mL, at pressure support of 0 and 10 cm H2O and PEEP of 5 and 10 cm H2O. We affixed the airway opening of the lung model to the mouth of a mannequin head and secured a mask on the mannequin face. We created a medium leak and a large leak with different size holes, and measured PEEP in the presence of leak. We also measured the actual pressure-support values and calculated the deviations from the set pressure-support value and the pressure-time product (PTP) of the airway opening pressure below and above baseline. RESULTS: With the medium leak only the Vision and Carina maintained the set PEEP and pressure support. With the large leak the pressure support was decreased with all the tested ventilators. With the larger leak and pressure support of 10 cm H2O the PTP below baseline for triggering increased with 2 ventilators, and the PTP above baseline for supporting the patient's inspiratory effort decreased with all 5 ventilators. The larger tidal volume increased the PTP below baseline with all 5 ventilators and at all leak sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the ventilators compensated for leak better than others. With the larger leak none of the ventilators maintained the set PEEP or pressure support.
Resource Utilization in Non-Academic Emergency Departments with Advanced Practice Providers

Ali Aledhaim,Anne Walker,Roumen Vesselinov,Jon Mark Hirshon,Laura Pimentel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42465

2019-07-01

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Introduction: Advanced practice providers (APP), including physicians' assistants and nurse practitioners, have been increasingly incorporated into emergency department (ED) staffing over the past decade. There is scant literature examining resource utilization and the cost benefit of having APPs in the ED. The objectives of this study were to compare resource utilization in EDs that use APPs in their staffing model with those that do not and to estimate costs associated with the utilized resources.Methods: In this five-year retrospective secondary data analysis of the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance (EDBA), we compared resource utilization rates in EDs with and without APPs in non-academic EDs. Primary outcomes were hospital admission and use of computed tomography (CT), radiography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Costs were estimated using the 2014 physician fee schedule and inpatient payments from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We measured outcomes as rates per 100 visits. Data were analyzed using a mixed linear model with repeated measures, adjusted for annual volume, patient acuity, and attending hours. We used the adjusted net difference to project utilization costs between the two groups per 1000 visits.Results: Of the 1054 EDs included in this study, 79% employed APPs. Relative to EDs without APPs, EDs staffing APPs had higher resource utilization rates (use per 100 visits): 3.0 more admissions (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0–4.1), 1.7 more CTs (95% CI, 0.2–3.1), 4.5 more radiographs (95% CI, 2.2–6.9), and 1.0 more ultrasound (95% CI, 0.3–1.7) but comparable MRI use 0.1 (95% CI, -0.2–0.3). Projected costs of these differences varied among the resource utilized. Compared to EDs without APPs, EDs with APPs were estimated to have 30.4 more admissions per 1000 visits, which could accrue $414,717 in utilization costs.Conclusion: EDs staffing APPs were associated with modest increases in resource utilization as measured by admissions and imaging studies.

emergency medicine
Profiles of Emergency Department Users with Psychiatric Disorders Related to Barriers to Outpatient Care

Tiffany Chen,Zhirong Cao,Francine Ferland,Lambert Farand,Marie-Josée Fleury

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21020234

IF: 4.614

2024-02-16

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a growing problem worldwide. High ED users have been historically targeted to reduce ED overcrowding and associated high costs. Patients with psychiatric disorders, including substance-related disorders (SRDs), are among the largest contributors to high ED use. Since EDs are meant for urgent cases, they are not an appropriate setting for treating recurrent patients or replacing outpatient care. Identifying ED user profiles in terms of perceived barriers to care, service use, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics is crucial to reduce ED use and unmet needs. Data were extracted from medical records and a survey was conducted among 299 ED patients from 2021 to 2022 in large Quebec networks. Cluster algorithms and comparison tests identified three profiles. Profile 1 had the most patients without barriers to care, with case managers, and received the best primary care. Profile 2 reported moderate barriers to care and low primary care use, best quality of life, and more serious psychiatric disorders. Profile 3 had the most barriers to care, high ED users, and lower service satisfaction and perceived mental/health conditions. Our findings and recommendations inform decision-makers on evidence-based strategies to address the unmet needs of these vulnerable populations.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Access to Federally Qualified Health Centers and Emergency Department Use among Uninsured and Medicaid‐insured Adults: California, 2005 to 2013

Julia B. Nath,Shaughnessy Costigan,Feng Lin,Eric Vittinghoff,Renee Y. Hsia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13494

2019-01-01

Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract:While improved access to safety net primary care providers, like federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), is often cited as a route to alleviate potentially preventable emergency department (ED) visits, no studies have longitudinally established the impact of improving access to FQHCs on ED use among Medicaid-insured and uninsured adults. We aimed to determine whether improved access to FQHCs was associated with lower ED use by uninsured and Medicaid-insured adults.Using data from the Uniform Data System, U.S. Census Bureau, and California Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of 58 California counties from 2005 to 2013. For each county-year observation, we employed three measures of FQHC access: geographic density of FQHCs (delivery sites per 100 square miles), FQHCs per county resident (delivery sites per 100,000 county residents), and the proportion of Medicaid-insured or uninsured residents ages 19 to 64 years that utilized FQHCs. We then used a fixed-effects model to examine the impact of changes in the measures of FQHC access on ED visit rates by Medicaid-insured or uninsured adults in each county.Increasing geographic density of FQHCs was associated with a 26% to 35% decrease in ED use by uninsured but not Medicaid-insured patients. Increasing numbers of clinics per county resident and higher percentages of Medicaid-insured and uninsured adults seen at FQHCs were not associated with reduced rates of ED use among either uninsured or Medicaid-insured adults.We were unable to detect a consistent association between our measures of FQHC access and ED use by Medicaid-insured and uninsured nonelderly California adults, underscoring the importance of investigating additional drivers to reduce ED use among these vulnerable patient populations.

[Reviewers: arbiters or consultants?].

Community characteristics affecting emergency department use by Medicaid enrollees

Delivery system emergency department capacity and its effect on nonsystem service utilization

Primary Care Enhanced Access Services and the Association With Nonurgent Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization and Child Opportunity Index

Hospital Capabilities Associated With Behavioral Health Integration Within Emergency Departments

Assessing Association Between Team Structure and Health Outcome and Cost by Social Network Analysis

Why Do Patients Opt for the Emergency Department over Other Care Choices? A Multi-Hospital Analysis

Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration and Care Utilization: Implications for Patient Outcome and Healthcare Resource Use

Reasons for High Emergency Department Use Among Patients With Common Mental Disorders or Substance-Related Disorders

Better Care, Same Cost - Reducing Unplanned Care for Multi-visit Patients: A Payer-Provider Model

Importance of medical home domains on emergency visits using a cross-sectional national survey of US children

Health center use and hospital-based care among individuals dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, 2012-2018

Prediction of recovery in antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis.

The Safety and Effectiveness of On-Site Paramedic and Allied Health Treatment Interventions Targeting the Reduction of Emergency Department Visits by Long-Term Care Patients: Systematic Review

[Aspergillus in the immunocompetent patient. Towards a new classification?].

Intensity of Social Needs Case Management Services and Changes in Hospital and Emergency Department Use Among Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries

Mental health care provision in community health centers and hospital emergency department utilization

A Bench Study of the Effects of Leak on Ventilator Performance During Noninvasive Ventilation

Resource Utilization in Non-Academic Emergency Departments with Advanced Practice Providers

Profiles of Emergency Department Users with Psychiatric Disorders Related to Barriers to Outpatient Care

Access to Federally Qualified Health Centers and Emergency Department Use among Uninsured and Medicaid‐insured Adults: California, 2005 to 2013