The Association Between Continuity Of Care And Medication Adherence Among Heart Failure Patients
Carine E. Hamo,Amrita Mukhopadhyay,Xiyue Li,Yaguang Zheng,Ian Kronish,Rumi Chunara,John Dodson,Samrachana Adhikari,Saul Blecker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.050
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Introduction Despite advances in medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), major gaps in medication adherence to guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) remain. The degree to which continuity of care is associated with medication adherence in HFrEF, and how this relates to outcomes, remains unknown. Hypothesis We hypothesized that among patients with HFrEF, greater continuity of care would be associated with greater pharmacy fill adherence to GDMT and improved outcomes. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults with a diagnosis of HF and EF≥40% within a large, diverse health system with at least two outpatient encounters between 1/1/2017 and 10/1/2021, who were prescribed ≥1 of the following GDMT: 1) Beta Blocker, 2) Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor/Angiotensin Receptor Blocker/Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor, 3) Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, 4) Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor. Continuity of care was calculated using the Bice-Boxerman Continuity of Care Index (COC) and the Usual Provider of Care (UPC) index, categorized by quantile, with higher quantiles indicating greater continuity of care. The primary outcome was medication adherence to GDMT, defined as average proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80% over one year. Secondary outcomes included all-cause and HF hospitalization within the same 1-year period. We developed separate multivariable logistic regression models to assess the relationship between COC and UPC with outcomes, adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance status, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and number of visits. Results A total of 3,971 individuals were included (mean age 72 years (SD 14), 71% male, 66% White race). The mean UPC was 0.84, categorized into tertiles (Q3: n=1899, all with UPC=1; Q2: =552, UPC=0.67-1; Q1: n=912, UPC<0.67). The mean COC was 0.46, categorized into quartiles (Q4: n=967, COC=0.67-1; Q3: n=1015, COC=0.35-0.67; Q2: n=941, COC=0.21-0.35; Q1: n=1048, COC=0-0.21). Unadjusted rates of adherence were similar across both UPC and COC quantiles (UPC Q3=65%, UPC Q2=68%, UPC Q1=66%, COC Q4=59%, COC Q3=69%, COC Q2=65%, COC Q1=64%). In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, UPC tertile was not significantly associated with adherence (all p>0.05). After adjustment, compared to individuals in the highest COC quartile, individuals in the third COC quartile had higher odds of adherence (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08-1.58, p=0.007), but no difference was seen in the first and second COC quartiles. As compared to the highest quantiles, the lowest UPC and COC quantiles had higher odds of hospitalization for any cause (UPC: OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.26-1.92; COC: OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.96-3.32) and for HF (UPC: OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.65-2.98; COC: OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.7-3.71). Conclusions We did not find significant associations between continuity of care and GDMT adherence among HFrEF patients. However, lower continuity was associated with increased hospitalization. These findings suggest a role for increased interactions with healthcare providers overall as a means of increasing adherence.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems