Abstract:BACKGROUND:Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique (ASIR-V) is usually set at different strengths according to the different clinical requirements and scenarios encountered when setting scanning protocols, such as setting a more aggressive tube current reduction (defined as preset ASIR-V). Reconstruction with ASIR-V is useful after scanning using image algorithms to improve image quality (defined as postset ASIR-V). The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of images reconstructed with preset and postset ASIR-V, using the same noncontrast abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (CT) protocols in the same individual on a wide detector CT.METHODS:We prospectively enrolled 141 patients. The scan protocols in Groups A-E were 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% preset ASIR-V, respectively, in the 256 wide-detector row Revolution CT (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). Each group was further divided into 5 subgroups with 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% postset ASIR-V, respectively. The 64-detector Discovery 750 HDCT (GE, USA) was used for Group F as a control group, using 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% ASIR, respectively. Image noise was measured in the spleen, aorta, and muscle. The CT attenuation and image noise were analyzed using the paired t-test; analysis of variance and post hoc multiple comparisons were made using the Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) method.RESULTS:The CT attenuation in Groups A-F exhibited no significant difference between subgroups in three organs (P>0.05). Only with increasing preset ASIR-V% (Groups A to E), did the image noise decrease, except in Group B in the aorta and muscle (NoiseB > NoiseA, PmuscleA&B=0.233, PaortaA&B=0.796). Only with increasing postset ASIR-V or ASIR% (Groups A and F), did the image noise decrease in the three organs. After preset and postset ASIR-V were combined, with preset ASIR-V% being equal to postset ASIR-V%, the image become similar to the corresponding preset ASIR-V part with the line of postset ASIR-V 0% (baseline of each group). When preset ASIR-V% was greater than the postset ASIR-V%, the image noise was higher than the baseline of each group. When preset ASIR-V% was less than the postset ASIR-V%, the image noise was lower than the baseline of each group. The radiation dose from B to E decreased from 11.2% to 57.1%. The CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) in Group F were significantly higher than those in Group A.CONCLUSIONS:Using both preset and postset ASIR-V allows dose reduction, with a potential to improve image quality only when postset ASIR-V% is higher than or equal to preset ASIR-V%. The image quality depends on postset ASIR-V%, whereas the decrease of radiation dose depends on preset ASIR-V%.

Comparison of different iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement boost technique on the image quality of CT pulmonary angiography for obese patients

Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography

Comparison of test bolus and bolus tracking techniques for dual-energy CT lung perfusion scan

[Optimization of Scan Protocol in Pulmonary Angiography of Second Generation Dual Source Computed Tomography].

Synthesizing Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography Images with an Improved Conditional Generative Adversarial Network

Improving Image Quality and Visualization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Arterial Phase Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement-Boost Technique

Application of a Deep Learning-Based Contrast-Boosting Algorithm to Low-Dose Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography With Reduced Iodine Load

Reducing both radiation and contrast doses for overweight patients in coronary CT angiography with 80-kVp and deep learning image reconstruction

Abdominal CT: Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques

Enhancing image quality in computed tomography angiography follow-ups after endovascular aneurysm repair: a comparative study of reconstruction techniques

WE‐C‐103‐12: Individually Optimized Contrast Injection in CT Angiography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Thromboembolic Disease

Application of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction on coronary artery angiography of overweight patients with dual-source CT

Evaluation Of Dose Reduction And Image Quality In Chest Ct Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction With The Same Group Of Patients

70-kVp High-pitch Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography with 40 mL Contrast Agent: Initial Experience

Comparison of Adaptive Statistical Iterative and Filtered Back Projection Reconstruction Techniques in Brain CT

Comparative study of abdominal CT enhancement in overweight and obese patients based on different scanning modes combined with different contrast medium concentrations

Image quality in CT thorax: effect of altering reconstruction algorithm and tube load

Effect of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on Image Quality of Chest Computed Tomography for COVID-19 Pneumonia

Impact of Preset and Postset Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V on Image Quality in Nonenhanced Abdominal-Pelvic CT on Wide-Detector Revolution CT.

Image quality assessment of artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction for low dose aortic CTA: A feasibility study of 70 kVp and reduced contrast medium volume

Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms in Magneto-Acousto-Electrical Computed Tomography (MAE-CT) for Image Quality Improvement