Abstract:A neuroscience-based approach has recently been proposed for the relation between the mind and the brain. The proposal is that events at the sub-neuronal, neuronal, and neuronal network levels take place simultaneously to perform a computation that can be described at a high level as a mental state, with content about the world. It is argued that as the processes at the different levels of explanation take place at the same time, they are linked by a non-causal supervenient relationship: causality can best be described in brains as operating within but not between levels. This mind-brain theory allows mental events to be different in kind from the mechanistic events that underlie them; but does not lead one to argue that mental events cause brain events, or vice versa: they are different levels of explanation of the operation of the computational system. Here, some implications are developed. It is proposed that causality, at least as it applies to the brain, should satisfy three conditions. First, interventionist tests for causality must be satisfied. Second, the causally related events should be at the same level of explanation. Third, a temporal order condition must be satisfied, with a suitable time scale in the order of 10 ms (to exclude application to quantum physics; and a cause cannot follow an effect). Next, although it may be useful for different purposes to describe causality involving the mind and brain at the mental level, or at the brain level, it is argued that the brain level may sometimes be more accurate, for sometimes causal accounts at the mental level may arise from confabulation by the mentalee, whereas understanding exactly what computations have occurred in the brain that result in a choice or action will provide the correct causal account for why a choice or action was made. Next, it is argued that possible cases of “downward causation” can be accounted for by a within-levels-of-explanation account of causality. This computational neuroscience approach provides an opportunity to proceed beyond Cartesian dualism and physical reductionism in considering the relations between the mind and the brain.

How computation explains

How (and Why) to Think that the Brain is Literally a Computer

Your Brain Is Like a Computer: Function, Analogy, Simplification

Brain Computations and Connectivity

How brains are built: Principles of computational neuroscience

A Neuroscience Levels of Explanation Approach to the Mind and the Brain

Computations by different types of brain, and by artificial neural systems

On the Relation Between the Mind and the Brain: A Neuroscience Perspective

The Computational Principles of Learning Ability

Brains as Computers: Metaphor, Analogy, Theory or Fact?

Toward the quantification of cognition

Computation As Social Agency: What, How and Who

Mind Causality: A Computational Neuroscience Approach

A New Age of Computing and the Brain

Hierarchies of description enable understanding of cognitive phenomena in terms of neuron activity

Microscopic computation in human brain evolution

Consciousness, Exascale Computational Power, Probabilistic Outcomes, and Energetic Efficiency

Computing Rule-Based Explanations by Leveraging Counterfactuals

Evaluating computational models of explanation using human judgments

On the computation of counterfactual explanations -- A survey

Understanding Human Cognition Through Computational Modeling