Abstract:One objective of neuroscience is to understand a wide range of specific cognitive processes in terms of neuron activity. The huge amount of observational data about the brain makes achieving this objective challenging. Different models on different levels of detail provide some insight, but the relationship between models on different levels is not clear. Complex computing systems with trillions of components like transistors are fully understood in the sense that system features can be precisely related to transistor activity. Such understanding could not involve a designer simultaneously thinking about the ongoing activity of all the components active in the course of carrying out some system feature. Brain modeling approaches like dynamical systems are inadequate to support understanding of computing systems, because their use relies on approximations like treating all components as more or less identical. Understanding computing systems needs a much more sophisticated use of approximation, involving creation of hierarchies of description in which the higher levels are more approximate, with effective translation between different levels in the hierarchy made possible by using the same general types of information processes on every level. These types are instruction and data read/write. There are no direct resemblances between computers and brains, but natural selection pressures have resulted in brain resources being organized into modular hierarchies and in the existence of two general types of information processes called condition definition/detection and behavioral recommendation. As a result, it is possible to create hierarchies of description linking cognitive phenomena to neuron activity, analogous with but qualitatively different from the hierarchies of description used to understand computing systems. An intuitively satisfying understanding of cognitive processes in terms of more detailed brain activity is then possible.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to understand the relationship between cognitive phenomena and neuronal activities by establishing description levels. Specifically, the paper explores whether the methods used to understand complex computing systems (such as computer systems with trillions of components) can be applied to understanding the brain, especially in terms of cognitive processes. Although the brain and the computer are very different in structure and function, the paper believes that the hierarchical description method for understanding computing systems can be used for reference to create a hierarchical description system that can link cognitive phenomena with neuronal activities. The keys to this method are: 1. **Multi - level description**: The paper emphasizes the need to establish multiple levels of description, from macroscopic cognitive phenomena to microscopic neuronal activities. There need to be clear relationships between these levels, so that high - level descriptions can be explained by low - level detailed activities. 2. **Approximation management**: Use appropriate approximation methods at each level to ensure that high - level descriptions are more abstract and low - level descriptions are more precise. This approximation management is achieved by using two general types of information processing - instructions and data reading and writing - at each level. 3. **Modular hierarchy**: The paper points out that the pressure of natural selection has led to the organization of brain resources into a modular hierarchical structure, similar to the modular hierarchy in computer systems. This structure helps to reduce the demand for information - processing resources and can be modified or new functions can be added without significantly affecting other functions. Through these methods, the paper aims to provide an intuitive and satisfactory way of understanding, linking complex cognitive processes with detailed brain activities. This not only helps theoretical understanding but may also provide guidance for future experimental design and data analysis.

Hierarchies of description enable understanding of cognitive phenomena in terms of neuron activity