Abstract:Key PointsUnderstanding the network organization of the brain has been a long-standing challenge for neuroscience. In the past decade, developments in graph theory have provided many new methods for topologically analysing complex networks, some of which have already been translated to the characterization of anatomical and functional brain networks.Anatomical networks at whole-brain and cellular scales in several species consistently demonstrate conservation of wiring costs and small-world topology (high clustering and short path length). Human brain anatomical networks, derived from MRI or diffusion tensor imaging data, have high-degree cortical 'hubs' and modular and hierarchical properties.Functional networks also demonstrate small-world properties at whole-brain and cellular spatial scales. Additionally, complex network properties including small-worldness and the existence of hubs are conserved over different frequency scales in functional MRI and electrophysiological data.Convergent experimental and computational data suggest that there is interdependence in the organization of structural and functional networks. The topology, synchronizability and other dynamic properties of functional networks are strongly affected by small-world and other metrics of structural connectivity. Conversely, over a slower timescale the dynamics can modulate structural network topology.Neuropsychiatric disorders can be thought of as dysconnectivity syndromes, and graph theory has already been used to quantify abnormality of structural and functional network properties in schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease and other disorders. Graph theory can help us to understand the vulnerability of brain networks to lesions and could in future be used to provide markers of genetic risk for disorders or to measure therapeutic effects of drug treatments on functional networks.The network organization of the brain, as it is beginning to be revealed by graph theory, is compatible with the hypothesis that the brain, perhaps in common with other complex networks, has evolved both to maximize the efficiency of information transfer and to minimize connection cost, at all scales of space and time. Key issues for future work include clarifying the relationship between the brain's network properties and its emergent cognitive behaviours in health and disease.

Common Connectome Constraints: From C. elegans and Drosophila to Homo sapiens

The Intrinsic Similarity of Topological Structure in Biological Neural Networks.

Evolution and development of Brain Networks: From Caenorhabditis elegans to Homo sapiens

Mesoscopic organization reveals the constraints governing C. elegans nervous system

Hierarchical communities in the larval connectome: Links to cellular annotations and network topology

Network Structure Governs Drosophila Brain Functionality

Hierarchical communities in the larval Drosophila connectome: Links to cellular annotations and network topology

Modular and Hierarchically Modular Organization of Brain Networks

Combined topological and spatial constraints are required to capture the structure of neural connectomes

Diverging network architecture of the $\textit{C. elegans}$ connectome and signaling network

A hierarchy index for networks in the brain reveals a complex entangled organizational structure

Neural network architecture of a mammalian brain

Hierarchical modularity in human brain functional networks

Brain connectomes come of age

Human Connectome: Structural and Functional Brain Networks

The growing topology of the C. elegans connectome

Modularity, Hierarchical Flows and Symmetry of the Drosophila Connectome

Predicting the connectivity of primate cortical networks from topological and spatial node properties

Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems

Parallel and converging multisensory cascades in the Drosophila connectome

Symmetries and synchronization from whole-neural activity in {\it C. elegans} connectome: Integration of functional and structural networks