Abstract:Introduction. Infectious gastroenteritis is a common reason for consulting a physician. Although most cases of gastrointestinal illness are self-limiting, the identification of the etiologic pathogen by stool specimen analysis is important in cases of more severe illness and for epidemiological reasons. Due to the broad range of causative pathogens, the conventional examination of a stool specimen is labour-intensive and usually requires different diagnostic methods. Multiplex PCR tests [e.g. BioFire Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel] allow the rapid detecting of up to 22 pathogens in one test. Hypothesis. Using a multiplex PCR panel to test stool specimens for infectious gastroenteritis pathogens can improve the detection rate, reduce the time-to-result and hands-on time and lower the costs of a microbiology laboratory. Aim. This study was aimed at evaluating the detection rate, the workflow and associated costs of stool specimen management using the BioFire GI Panel versus conventional methods. Methodology. Stool specimens were evaluated prospectively during the routine operation. Pathogen detection rate, hands-on time, time-to-result and material and personnel costs were determined for the BioFire GI Panel and conventional methods—the latter based on physician request and excluding viral testing. Results. Analysing 333 specimens collected between 2019 and 2020, the detection rate of enteropathogens was significantly higher with a positivity rate of 39.9 % using the multiplex PCR panel compared with 15.0 % using the conventional methods. The BioFire GI Panel presented results in a median time of 2.2 h compared with 77.5 h for culture and 22.1 h for antigen testing, noting that no tests were performed at weekends except for toxinogenic Clostridioides difficile . Based on list prices, the BioFire GI Panel was nine times more expensive compared with conventional methods, whereas hands-on-time was significantly lower using the BioFire GI Panel. Conclusion. Multiplex PCR panels are valuable tools for laboratory identification of infectious agents causing diarrhoea. The higher costs of such a multiplex PCR panel might be outweighed by the higher detection rate, ease of handling, rapid results and most likely improved patient management. However, these panels do not provide information on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Therefore, if this is necessary for targeted therapy or if outbreak monitoring and control is required, specimens must still be cultured.

Comparative Evaluation of Two Molecular Multiplex Syndromic Panels with Acute Gastroenteritis

Evaluation of the Seegene Allplex™ Respiratory Panel for diagnosis of acute respiratory tract infections

Comparative evaluation of the detection rate, workflow and associated costs of a multiplex PCR panel versus conventional methods in diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis

Gastrointestinal Panel Performance for the Diagnosis of Acute Gastroenteritis in Pediatric Patients

Detection and Characterization of Bacterial and Viral Acute Gastroenteritis among Outpatient Children under 5 Years Old in Guangzhou, China

Implementing a Multiplex-PCR Test for the Diagnosis of Acute Gastroenteritis in Hospitalized Children: Are All Enteric Viruses the Same?

Comparison of the Simplexa GBS Direct and ARIES GBS assays for the detection of S. agalactiae in broth-enriched swab specimens

Clinical Performance of the LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0 Assay in Patients with Suspected Gastroenteritis

Performance Evaluation of NovaplexTM Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Streptococcus agalactiae Serotypes

BD MAX Enteric Bacterial, Bacterial Plus, and Virus Panels for Diagnosis of Acute Infectious Gastroenteritis: a Cost-Benefit Analysis

Establishment of a Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of SS-2,APP and PM

Assessment of a Multiplex LAMP Assay (Eazyplex® CSF Direct M) for Rapid Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis: Accuracy and Pitfalls

The application and epidemiological research of xTAG-GPP multiplex PCR in the Diagnosis of children persistent and chronic diarrhea

Multiplex PCR detection of enteric pathogens in a community-based birth cohort in Ecuador: comparison of xTAG-GPP and TaqMan array card assays

The application research of xTAG GPP multiplex PCR in the diagnosis of persistent and chronic diarrhea in children

Gastrointestinal PCR panel results and antibiotic use in acute gastroenteritis cases: How appropriate are we in our usage?

Comparison of BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel versus Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (xTAG GPP) for diarrheal pathogen detection in China

Investigation of the use of multiplex PCR in childhood diarrhea with clinical and epidemiological features

Applicability of Commercial Multiplex Kit for the Diagnosis Of: a Multicenter Investigation Clostridium Difficile Infections

Unusual Combination of Gastrointestinal Pathogens Detected by Multiplex PCR

Clinical impact of a gastrointestinal PCR panel in children with infectious diarrhoea