Abstract:The scientific literature is a record of the search for truth. Publication of faked data diverts this search. The scientific community has a duty to warn people to ignore an article containing faked data and must try to prevent inadvertent citation of it. The scientific community accomplishes these tasks by publishing a retraction and linking it to the fraudulent article's citation in electronic indexes of the medical literature, such as PubMed. This mechanism is far from perfect, as shown by a case history of scientific fraud perpetrated by Eric Poehlman, PhD. His institution notified 3 journals that they had published tainted articles. Two journals failed to retract. The third journal retracted immediately, but other authors continued to cite the retracted article. Another duty of the scientific community is to verify the integrity of other articles published by the author of a fraudulent article. This task falls to the author's institution and requires coauthors to vouch for their article's integrity by convincing institutional investigators that the suspect author could not have altered the raw scientific data from their study. Two universities are currently investigating Poehlman's published research. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific literature requires governmental institutions that have the authority to investigate and punish guilty scientists and requires that research institutions investigate alleged fraud. It requires journal editors to issue a retraction when they learn that their journal has published a tainted article. It requires research institutions to accept their responsibility to investigate every article published by a scientist who has published even 1 fraudulent article. Finally, it requires authors to take pains to avoid citing retracted articles and to issue a correction when they inadvertently cite a retracted article.

Why a publisher retracted abortion-pill studies cited in a case set for the Supreme Court

Daily briefing: Influential abortion pill studies retracted

'Doing good science is hard': retraction of high-profile reproducibility study prompts soul-searching

Retracted: Judicial Application of Punitive Damages for Ecological Environment Infringement in Civil Public Interest Litigation

Women Are Underrepresented Among Authors of Retracted Publications: Retrospective Study of 134 Medical Journals

Exploring the landscape of academic retractions in medicine: a comprehensive umbrella review

Retraction: The turnaway study: A case of self-correction in science upended by political motivation and unvetted findings

Exclusive: the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies

Retracted: Research on the Path and Effect Evaluation of Students' Quality Improvement in Private Colleges

Retracted: USP21 Promotes the Progression of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Regulating FOXM1

Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case

Retracted: Case Management Improves Satisfaction, Anxiety, and Depression of Patients with Pregnancy Loss after In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer

Retractions lag for wave of suspect papers

Retracted: Effects of Ulinastatin on Proliferation and Apoptosis of Breast Cancer Cells by Inhibiting the ERK Signaling Pathway

Retraction Note

Retraction: The effects of sildenafil in maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Retracted: The Anatase Phase of Nanotopography Titania with Higher Roughness Has Better Biocompatibility in Osteoblast Cell Morphology and Proliferation

Retracted: Fbxw7 and Skp2 Regulate Stem Cell Switch between Quiescence and Mitotic Division in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Retracted: The Ecological Consciousness of Natural Writing in British and American Romantic Literature

Retracted: SPOP Inhibition of Endometrial Carcinoma and Its Clinicopathological Relationship

Retracted: Clinical Efficacy of Assisted Reproductive Technology Combined with Progesterone Capsules in the Treatment of Infertility Caused by Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Its Influence on Serum FSH, E2, and LH Levels of Patients