Can we better understand strabismus research?

Suqing Gou,Jiexiao Chen,Jieling Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03491-6
IF: 4.4563
2024-11-25
Eye
Abstract:We read with interest the study by Arblaster GE and colleagues [1] on the psychosocial benefits of strabismus surgery in adults. The study shows improvements in vision, task performance, physical symptoms, confidence, and emotional well-being, highlighting the need for funding and policy support for these procedures. This practical, policy-oriented approach is rare in the literature and offers valuable insights, though some concerns remain. First, combining subjective and objective assessments could improve evaluation accuracy. This study relies heavily on patient self-reports, lacking quantitative support from standardized tools. Incorporating visual function tests such as the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire [2] or validated anxiety and depression scales, such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [3] or the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [4], would strengthen the findings by integrating qualitative insights with quantitative data, thereby enhancing the study's reliability.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?