Abstract:The electric field of an orbiting charge or electron observed in the rotating frame takes on a circular trajectory with a maximum radius of R=cω′\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$R=\frac{c}{\omega '}$$\end{document}. The resultant extended electromagnetic structure is used to derive the spin–orbit energy of the orbiting electron. A surprising result of the derived expression is that the orbital velocity has a specific value (β0=1136.96\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\beta _0 = \frac{1}{136.96}$$\end{document}) in close agreement (99.94%\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$99.94\%$$\end{document}) with the experimentally determined value for the fine structure constant (ħ=ke2c1αexp=ke2c1β0→αexp=β0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\hbar =\frac{ke^2}{c}\frac{1}{\alpha _{\mathrm{exp}}} =\frac{ke^2}{c}\frac{1}{\beta _0} \rightarrow \alpha _{\mathrm{exp}}=\beta _0$$\end{document}). Furthermore, the derived spin–orbit expression does not include a g-factor (i.e g=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$g=1$$\end{document}) which means that the Larmor and Thomas precessions are equal and opposite, resulting in zero net precession in the lab frame. These results suggest that the quantised fine structure constant and by extension Planck’s constant, are a natural extension of classical electromagnetism and conservation of energy in a rotating frame.

Bohr postulates derived from the toroidal electron model

Modeling Rabi Oscillation By Rigorously Solving Maxwell-Schrodinger Equation

Forming Three-Dimensional Colloidal Structures Using Holographic Optical Tweezers

Rejection of Rutherford's Planetary Model of the Atom, Bohr's Postulates and the Tunnel Effect

On the Bohr radius relationship to spin-orbit interaction, spin magnitude, and Thomas precession

Theory of Electrons with Orbital Degeneracy

Mathematical Analysis of a Bohr Atom Model

Electromagnetic Angular Momentum of an Orbiting Charge

Double-valuedness of the electron wave function and rotational zero-point motion of electrons in rings

Bound-state solutions for the charged Dirac oscillator in a rotating frame in the Bonnor-Melvin-Lambda spacetime

A mechanical analog of Bohr's atom based on de Broglie's double-solution approach

Bohrification

Bohm - de Broglie Cycles

Loop Quantization of Maxwell Theory and Electric Charge Quantization

The nature of the electron

Quantized Kepler-Coulomb dynamical models on two-dimensional constant curvature spaces

The hydrogen atom in an electric field: closed-orbit theory with bifurcating orbits

Modern semiclassical theory of magnetic transport and breakdown

Simple model of self-supported deformed states of isolated atoms

On Langmuir's periodic orbit

Relativistic electrons coupled with Newtonian nuclear dynamics