Electromagnetic Angular Momentum of an Orbiting Charge

W. J. Trompetter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00506-0
2021-10-01
Foundations of Physics
Abstract:The electric field of an orbiting charge or electron observed in the rotating frame takes on a circular trajectory with a maximum radius of R=cω′\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$R=\frac{c}{\omega '}$$\end{document}. The resultant extended electromagnetic structure is used to derive the spin–orbit energy of the orbiting electron. A surprising result of the derived expression is that the orbital velocity has a specific value (β0=1136.96\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\beta _0 = \frac{1}{136.96}$$\end{document}) in close agreement (99.94%\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$99.94\%$$\end{document}) with the experimentally determined value for the fine structure constant (ħ=ke2c1αexp=ke2c1β0→αexp=β0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\hbar =\frac{ke^2}{c}\frac{1}{\alpha _{\mathrm{exp}}} =\frac{ke^2}{c}\frac{1}{\beta _0} \rightarrow \alpha _{\mathrm{exp}}=\beta _0$$\end{document}). Furthermore, the derived spin–orbit expression does not include a g-factor (i.e g=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$g=1$$\end{document}) which means that the Larmor and Thomas precessions are equal and opposite, resulting in zero net precession in the lab frame. These results suggest that the quantised fine structure constant and by extension Planck’s constant, are a natural extension of classical electromagnetism and conservation of energy in a rotating frame.
physics, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?