Abstract:Abstract Background: Propensity score weighting methods are frequently used in observational studies to estimate causal effects. However, researchers usually evaluate their performance only in homogeneous populations. When treatment effects are heterogeneous, it is unclear about the ability of commonly used weighting methods in estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) for the whole population. Methods: Two categories of propensity score weighting approaches are discussed to estimate the ATE for the whole population with heterogeneity: one in which the target of inference is the whole population, including Stabilized inverse probability weighting (SIPW), Empirical likelihood weighting (ELW), Covariate balancing propensity score weighting (CBPS); and the other whose target of inference is the specific population, including Inverse probability weighting with trimming (IPWT), Overlap weighting (OW). To assess the performance of these methods, a simulation study was conducted in terms of bias and root mean square error (RMSE), under six heterogeneity scenarios and three degrees of overlap in the propensity score distributions. Results: According to simulation results, approaches that target the specific population have a substantial bias that rises quickly with increasing heterogeneity. In contrast, approaches for the whole population perform well with relatively smaller bias and RMSE, where CBPS outperforms the others in all heterogeneity scenarios and overlap degrees. When methods are applied to Lindner data with heterogeneity, the results of approaches for the whole population are quite different from approaches for the specific population. Conclusions: When the estimand is the ATE for the whole populations with heterogeneity, applying weighting methods that target specific populations (e.g. IPWT, OW) to estimate it would lead to substantial bias. It is recommended to use methods targeting the whole population (e.g. CBPS, ELW) to achieve this goal.

Propensity score analysis for health care disparities: a deweighting approach

Propensity score weighting for causal inference with multiple treatments

Debiased Inverse Propensity Score Weighting for Estimation of Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Confounders

Evaluating propensity score weighting methods in heterogeneous population: a comparative study

Propensity Score Weighting for Causal Subgroup Analysis

[Introduction to an Individual-Based Standardization Method -- Propensity Score Weighting].

Propensity score weighting for causal inference with clustered data

Information projection approach to smoothed propensity score weighting for handling selection bias under missing at random

Propensity score weighting for causal inference with multi-stage clustered data

Robust Estimation of Propensity Score Weights via Subclassification

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Propensity score analysis with latent covariates: Measurement error bias correction using the covariate's posterior mean, aka the inclusive factor score

GBM Propensity Score Weighting for Causal Inference Research

Propensity Score Weighting with Missing Data on Covariates and Clustered Data Structure

Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights

Using Propensity Scores to Estimate Effects of Treatment Initiation Decisions: State of the Science

Estimating and Using Propensity Scores with Partially Missing Data

A propensity score weighting approach to integrate aggregated data in random-effect individual-level data meta-analysis

Comparison of two propensity score-based methods for balancing covariates: the overlap weighting and fine stratification methods in real-world claims data

Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure

Measuring covariate balance in weighted propensity score analyses by the weighted z-difference