Interactions between parenting styles, child anxiety, and oppositionality in selective mutism

Ortal Slobodin,Maayan Shorer,Gilor Friedman Zeltzer,Silvana Fennig
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02484-w
2024-06-06
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Abstract:Selective mutism (SM) is a poorly understood condition, and debate continues regarding its etiology and classification. Research suggests that a genetic vulnerability may play a role in the development of the disorder which may be compounded by anxious and over-protective parenting. While previous studies supported the role of parenting styles in the development of SM, most of them examined child and parent factors in isolation. The current study examined how the interactions between child internalizing and externalizing behaviors (anxiety and oppositionality, respectively) and parenting styles (authoritative, permissive, and authoritarian) are associated with SM diagnosis. The study included 285 children aged 3–7 years (57.2% females), and their parents (66 children with SM and 219 typically developed children). Parents completed questionnaires about child social anxiety, oppositional behavior, SM severity, and their parenting style. Results showed that parents of children with SM reported lower levels of authoritative practices than those of typically developed children. We also found that child social anxiety and oppositionality moderated the effects of authoritative and authoritarian parenting practices on SM diagnosis. Our results suggest that child anxiety and oppositionality may explain the different susceptibility of children to adaptive and maladaptive parenting styles.
pediatrics,psychiatry,psychology, developmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the causes of Selective Mutism (SM) and its relationship with parenting styles. Specifically, the study aims to explore how the interaction between children's internalizing behaviors (such as anxiety) and externalizing behaviors (such as oppositional behavior) with three types of parenting styles (authoritative, permissive, and authoritarian) influences the diagnosis of SM. ### Main Research Questions: 1. **The relationship between children's SM and anxiety and oppositional behavior**: The study hypothesizes that children with SM will exhibit higher levels of social anxiety and oppositional behavior. 2. **The relationship between parenting styles and SM**: The study hypothesizes that parents of children with SM will more frequently adopt authoritarian and permissive parenting styles, and less frequently adopt authoritative parenting styles. 3. **The moderating role of children's anxiety and oppositional behavior in the relationship between parenting styles and SM diagnosis**: The study hypothesizes that the levels of children's anxiety and oppositional behavior will moderate the relationship between parenting styles and SM diagnosis, particularly that children with high anxiety and high oppositional behavior are more likely to be diagnosed with SM under authoritarian and permissive parenting styles. ### Research Background: Selective Mutism (SM) is a psychological disorder characterized by a persistent inability to speak in specific social situations, despite being able to communicate normally in other settings. Although research on SM has been increasing, its etiology and classification remain controversial. Studies suggest that genetic susceptibility, anxiety, and overprotective parenting may play significant roles in the development of SM. However, most previous research has primarily focused on either child or parent factors, neglecting the interaction between the two. ### Research Methods: - **Participants**: 285 children aged 3-7 years (66 diagnosed with SM and 219 typically developing children) and their parents. - **Measurement Tools**: Including the Child Anxiety Scale, Child Behavior Checklist, and Parenting Styles Questionnaire. - **Data Analysis**: Independent sample t-tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and conditional process modeling were used to analyze the data. ### Research Results: - **Children's Age and Family Income**: Children in the SM group were slightly older than those in the control group, but there was no significant difference in family income. - **SM Symptoms and Social Anxiety**: Children in the SM group had significantly higher levels of social anxiety than those in the control group, and their parents reported less use of authoritative parenting styles. - **Relationship between Parenting Styles and SM**: Authoritative parenting style and children's anxiety had main effects on the diagnosis of SM, and the interaction between authoritative parenting style and children's anxiety was significant. Additionally, the three-way interaction among these factors was significant, indicating that authoritative parenting style significantly reduced the probability of SM diagnosis in children with high anxiety and moderate to high oppositional behavior. ### Conclusion: The results support the moderating role of children's anxiety and oppositional behavior in the relationship between parenting styles and SM diagnosis. Specifically, children with high anxiety and moderate to high oppositional behavior are less likely to be diagnosed with SM under authoritative parenting styles, but more likely to be diagnosed with SM under authoritarian and permissive parenting styles. These findings contribute to understanding the complex mechanisms of SM and provide a theoretical basis for future interventions.