Abstract:Maintaining biodiversity requires direct and indirect interspecific interactions. The study of direct interactions, including competition, predation, mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism, has greatly promoted the development of species coexistence theory'. However, as a simplified method to explain community assembly, direct interactions alone cannot adequately explain the coexistence of related species in the absence of indirect interactions. Indirect interactions can be defined as the impact of one species on another that is mediated or transmitted by a third, and they are considered to be a more complex and less understood type of interspecific interaction. During the past two decades, scientists have gradually realized that a type of density-mediated indirect interaction, known as intransitive competition, is ubiquitous in nature. Intransitive competition can be described as a game of "rockpaper-scissors" in which three species A, B and C have competitive ranks A>B>C>A. In this competitive mode, competitive exclusion between relative species is counteracted by mutual restrictiveness, and there are no "invincible" species in the community. Therefore, intransitive competition is an important factor in promoting species coexistence, which affects species distribution patterns, community structure and ecosystem functions. To summarize the theory' of intransitive competition, this paper discusses the definition, characteristics, and detection methods of intransitive competition and the main factors affecting intransitive competition as well. There are five formation modes of intransitive competition. Resource utilization mode occurs when species have different competitive abilities for resources. Life history mode arises if species cannot maintain an absolute competitive advantage throughout their life stages. Behavioral trade-off mode follows when species have different ways of acquiring resources. Competition trade-off mode and allelopathy mode require species to develop both aggressive and defensive survival strategies. Our paper also explores three characteristics of intransitive competition. First, the populations of species participating in intransitive competition often exhibit periodic fluctuations in their frequency. which are regulated by dynamic equilibrium. Second, intransitive competition systems involving an odd number of species can maintain community stability, whereas systems involving an even number of species will theoretically collapse. Finally, multiple intransitive competition loops may appear in the community, and intransitive competition may also be nested in other coexistence patterns. This nested feature makes intransitive competition difficult to detect and measure. Fortunately, current research methods such as competition matrix, transfer matrix and invasion growth rate model can be used to infer the existence of intransitive competition and quantify its prevalence and importance. Competitive rank has been considered as one of the most important factors affecting intransitive competition. The higher the coefficient of variation of competitive rank among species, the more negative impact on intransitive competition. At the same time, global-scale environmental changes could also be critical factors: drought increases the intransitive competition in the community, but eutrophication caused by land-use intensification reduces the intransitive competition. Functional traits are non-negligible because species traits adapted to high-productivity environments often impede the formation of intransitive competition. Finally, to promote the understanding of indirect interaction and multi-species coexistence strategies, we propose that future research on intransitive competition should focus on long-term controlled field experiments, coupled with theoretical considerations of high-order interactions, complex networks, and ecosystem function.

Identification of the Interaction Coefficients in an Intraspecific Competition Model with Diffusion Terms

Coexistence of two species with intra- and interspecific competition in an unstirred chemostat

The Role of Intransitive Competition in Species Coexistence

Optimal resource control in reaction diffusion advection population model

Reaction–diffusion equations of two species competing for two complementary resources with internal storage

Global dynamics of two-species reaction–diffusion competition model with Gompertz growth

Steady state coexistence solutions of reaction-diffusion competition models

Competitive exclusion and coexistence in an intraguild predation model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response

Competition in the presence of a lethal external inhibitor.

On A Resource Based Ecological Competition Model with Interference

Coexistence states for a Lotka–Volterra competitive model with aggressive movement strategy

On the Lotka-Volterra competition system with dynamical resources and density-dependent diffusion

Spatial Dynamics of a Nonlocal Model with Periodic Delay and Competition

On the Dynamics of Two-consumers-one-resource Competing Systems with Beddington-DeAngelis Functional Response

Populations with individual variation in dispersal in heterogeneous environments: dynamics and competition with simply diffusing populations

Coexistence states in a cross-diffusion system of a competition model

A Mechanistically Integrated Model of Exploitative and Interference Competition over a Single Resource Produces Widespread Coexistence

Optimal State Equation for the Control of a Diffusion with Two Distinct Dynamics

A competition model with impulsive interventions and environmental perturbations in moving environments

The diffusion identification in a SIS reaction-diffusion system

Analysis of the dynamics induced by a competition index in a heterogeneous population of plants: from an individual-based model to a macroscopic model