Human-Robot Joint Misalignment, Physical Interaction, and Gait Kinematic Assessment in Ankle-Foot Orthoses

Ricardo Luís Andrade,Joana Figueiredo,Pedro Fonseca,João P. Vilas-Boas,Miguel T. Silva,Cristina P. Santos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010246

IF: 3.9

2024-01-01

Sensors

Abstract:Lower limb exoskeletons and orthoses have been increasingly used to assist the user during gait rehabilitation through torque transmission and motor stability. However, the physical human-robot interface (HRi) has not been properly addressed. Current orthoses lead to spurious forces at the HRi that cause adverse effects and high abandonment rates. This study aims to assess and compare, in a holistic approach, human-robot joint misalignment and gait kinematics in three fixation designs of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs). These are AFOs with a frontal shin guard (F-AFO), lateral shin guard (L-AFO), and the ankle modulus of the H2 exoskeleton (H2-AFO). An experimental protocol was implemented to assess misalignment, fixation displacement, pressure interactions, user-perceived comfort, and gait kinematics during walking with the three AFOs. The F-AFO showed reduced vertical misalignment (peak of 1.37 ± 0.90 cm, p-value < 0.05), interactions (median pressures of 0.39–3.12 kPa), and higher user-perceived comfort (p-value < 0.05) when compared to H2-AFO (peak misalignment of 2.95 ± 0.64 and pressures ranging from 3.19 to 19.78 kPa). F-AFO also improves the L-AFO in pressure (median pressures ranging from 8.64 to 10.83 kPa) and comfort (p-value < 0.05). All AFOs significantly modified hip joint angle regarding control gait (p-value < 0.01), while the H2-AFO also affected knee joint angle (p-value < 0.01) and gait spatiotemporal parameters (p-value < 0.05). Overall, findings indicate that an AFO with a frontal shin guard and a sports shoe is effective at reducing misalignment and pressure at the HRI, increasing comfort with slight changes in gait kinematics.

engineering, electrical & electronic,chemistry, analytical,instruments & instrumentation

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation and comparison of the effects of three different fixed designs of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on human-robot joint misalignment and gait kinematics. Specifically, the study aims to comprehensively assess the following three fixed designs of ankle-foot orthoses: AFO with anterior tibial shell (F-AFO), AFO with lateral tibial shell (L-AFO), and the ankle module of the H2 exoskeleton system (H2-AFO). The primary objective of the study is to quantify the human-robot joint misalignment and gait kinematic effects of these ankle-foot orthoses and to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these three fixed designs based on this. Additionally, the study explores which fixed design can reduce misalignment, related interactions, gait interference, and improve user satisfaction. This analysis aims to provide guidance for future research on the fixed design of ankle-foot orthoses and to promote research on human-robot misalignment measurement and design alignment solutions.