Abstract:Nearshore seagrass, kelp, and other macroalgae beds (submerged aquatic vegetation [SAV]) are productive and important ecosystems. Mitigating anthropogenic impacts on these habitats requires tools to quantify their ecological value and the debits and credits of impact and mitigation. To summarize and clarify the state of SAV habitat quantification and available tools, we searched peer‐reviewed literature and other agency documents for methods that either assigned ecological value to or calculated equivalencies between impact and mitigation in SAV. Out of 47 tools, there were 11 equivalency methods, 7 of which included a valuation component. The remaining valuation methods were most commonly designed for seagrasses and rocky intertidal macroalgae rather than canopy‐forming kelps. Tools were often designed to address specific resource policies and associated habitat evaluation. Frequent categories of tools and methods included those associated with habitat equivalency analyses and those that scored habitats relative to reference or ideal conditions, including models designed for habitat suitability indices and the European Union's Water and Marine Framework Directives. Over 29 tool input metrics spanned 3 spatial scales of SAV: individual shoots or stipes, bed or site, and landscape or region. The most common metric used for both seagrasses and macroalgae was cover. Seagrass tools also often employed density measures, and some categories used measures of tissue content (e.g., carbon, nitrogen). Macroalgal tools for rocky intertidal habitats frequently included species richness or incorporated indicator species to assess habitat. We provide a flowchart for decision‐makers to identify representative tools that may apply to their specific management needs. Revisión de la valoración ecológica y los métodos de análisis de equivalencia para evaluar la vegetación acuática sumergida de las costas templadas Resumen Los pastos marinos, el quelpo y otros lechos de macroalgas (vegetación acuática sumergida [VAS]) son ecosistemas costeros importantes y productivos. Se necesitan herramientas para cuantificar el valor ecológico y los créditos y débitos del impacto y la mitigación de los impactos antropogénicos en estos hábitats. Para resumir y aclarar el estado de la cuantificación del hábitat de la VAS, buscamos métodos que asignaran el valor ecológico o calcularan las equivalencias entre el impacto y la mitigación de la VAS en la literatura revisada por pares y otros documentos de agencia. De las 47 herramientas, 11 eran métodos de equivalencia y 7 de estas incluían un componente de valoración. Los métodos restantes de valoración fueron diseñados en su mayoría para los pastos marinos y las macroalgas del intermareal rocoso en lugar de para los quelpos que forman doseles. Con frecuencia las herramientas fueron diseñadas para abordar las políticas de recursos específicos y la evaluación de los hábitats asociados. Las categorías frecuentes de las herramientas y de los métodos incluyeron aquellas asociadas con los análisis de equivalencia de hábitat y aquellas que puntuaron los hábitats en relación con las condiciones ideales o de referencia, incluyendo modelos diseñados para los índices de idoneidad del hábitat y las Directivas del Marco de la Unión Europea para el Agua y el Medio Marino. Las medidas de entrada de datos de la herramienta abarcaron tres escalas espaciales de VAS: brotes o estípites individuales, lecho o sitio, y paisaje o región. La medida más utilizada tanto para los pastos marinos como para las macroalgas fue la cobertura. Las herramientas para los pastos marinos también emplearon a menudo medidas de densidad y algunas categorías utilizaron medidas de contenido tisular (p. ej.: carbono o nitrógeno). Las herramientas de macroalgas para el intermareal rocoso a menudo incluían la riqueza de especies o incorporaban especies indicadoras para evaluar el hábitat. Proporcionamos un diagrama de flujo para que los responsables de la toma de decisiones identifiquen herramientas representativas que puedan aplicarse a sus necesidades específicas de gestión.

Review of ecological valuation and equivalency analysis methods for assessing temperate nearshore submerged aquatic vegetation

Unoccupied aerial vehicle-assisted monitoring of benthic vegetation in the coastal zone enhances the quality of ecological data

Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provided by Macrophytes in Southern Baltic and Southern Mediterranean Coastal Lagoons

A simple approach to estimating the nutrient and carbon storage benefits of restoring submerged aquatic vegetation, applied to Vallisneria americana in the Caloosahatchee Estuary, Florida, USA

Economic valuation of Harmful Algal Blooms (HAB): Methodological challenges, policy implications, and an empirical application

Choosing the Right Tool: A Comparative Study of Wetland Assessment Approaches

Assessment of goods and services, vulnerability, and conservation status of European seabed biotopes: a stepping stone towards ecosystem-based marine spatial management

Assessing the effectiveness of marine nature‐based solutions with climate risk assessments

Quality Index of Subtidal Macroalgae (QISubMac): A suitable tool for ecological quality status assessment under the scope of the European Water Framework Directive

Examining the commonalities and knowledge gaps in coastal zone vegetation simulation models

Optimizing marine macrophyte capacity to locally ameliorate ocean acidification under variable light and flow regimes: Insights from an experimental approach

Towards a sampling design for characterizing habitat-specific benthic biodiversity related to oxygen flux dynamics using Aquatic Eddy Covariance

Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide

New tools and recommendations for a better management of harmful algal blooms under the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Improving marine biodiversity offsetting: A proposed methodology for better assessing losses and gains

Ecological assessments with algae: a review and synthesis

Vegetation quality assessment: A sampling-based loss-gain accounting framework for native, disturbed and reclaimed vegetation

Identification and application of quality elements, indicators, and criteria for assessment of impact on habitats in marine Natura 2000 areas

Thresholds of Adverse Effects of Macroalgal Abundance and Sediment Organic Matter on Benthic Habitat Quality in Estuarine Intertidal Flats

Calculating carbon: The value of information in precision for blue carbon restoration projects

Socio-Economic Analytical Frameworks for Marine Spatial Planning: Evaluating Tools and Methodologies for Sustainable Decision Making