Abstract:Background: This systematic map principally sought to understand the different forms of effectiveness that existing studies evaluate in relation to Natural Flood Management (NFM) in the UK with a supplementary question of whether studies engaged with climate change and future flood risk. NFM measures seek to protect, enhance, emulate, or restore the natural function of rivers as part of approaches to flood risk management (FRM). While there is agreement in both academic and practice/policy literature that NFM should be part of a holistic FRM strategy to address current and future flood risk, the specifics of how to expand the application of and consistently implement NFM successfully in practice are less well known. A core focus of this study is on how the effectiveness of NFM measures is evaluated in different studies based on approaches drawn from the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) literature: procedural, substantive, transactive and normative. The systematic map also examines how studies account for climate change, which is a crucial issue given the connections between NFM and climate change adaptation and resilience. Methods: We searched 13 bibliographic databases, Google scholar as a web-based search engine, and 21 organisational sites. Articles were screened by title, abstract, and full text based on defined eligibility criteria. Checks were performed for consistency amongst reviewers. Forms of effectiveness were coded on the basis of the included studies in the systematic map. The quantity and characteristics of the available evidence are summarised with the frequencies of effectiveness forms for each NFM measure are presented in heat maps. Review findings: A total of 216 articles reported eligible studies that were coded as part of the systematic map. Overall, the systematic map shows that the majority of studies considered at least one approach to effectiveness; however, very few studies considered multiple forms of effectiveness. The systematic map also demonstrates that climate change is considered systematically by around one-quarter of studies although many studies make claims about NFM's effectiveness in the face of future climatic change. Conclusions: NFM can be effective in several different ways owing to their multiple benefits; however, there are evidence gaps around understanding these different forms of effectiveness. This is particularly marked for studies considering transactive and normative effectiveness. Interdisciplinary studies are more likely to consider multiple forms of effectiveness. This systematic map also found that whilst 75% of studies mention future climate change in their studies, only 24.1% contain a systematic consideration of the issue through, for example, using climate change projections. NFM is also at risk of climate change (e.g. through drought) and therefore it is imperative that study designs seek to incorporate consideration of effectiveness under future climate change. Policymakers should be made aware of the lack of understanding of how NFM measures perform under future climate change.

Assessing the effectiveness of marine nature‐based solutions with climate risk assessments

Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: Modelling methods, advantages and limitations

A risk assessment for the remote ocean: the case of the South East Atlantic

Pluvial flood adaptation using nature-based solutions: An integrated biophysical-economic assessment

The value of marsh restoration for flood risk reduction in an urban estuary

Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges

A climate risk index for marine life

What approaches exist to evaluate the effectiveness of UK-relevant natural flood management measures? A systematic map

Nature-based solutions for coastal risk management in the Mediterranean basin: A literature review

Comparing the cost effectiveness of nature-based and coastal adaptation: A case study from the Gulf Coast of the United States

Risk management tools for sustainable fisheries management under changing climate: a sea cucumber example

Assessing nature-based solutions in the face of urban vulnerabilities: a multi-criteria decision approach

A rapid assessment method to monitor the health status of habitat‐forming species in coastal benthic ecosystems

An indicator-based approach for assessing marine ecosystem resilience

Evaluating Nature-based Solutions as urban resilience and climate adaptation tools: A meta-analysis of their benefits on heatwaves and floods

A GIS-MCDA approach to map environmental suitability of Posidonia oceanica meadows as blue nature-based solutions in the Mediterranean eco-region

Economic assessment of nature-based solutions to reduce flood risk and enhance co-benefits

Improving marine biodiversity offsetting: A proposed methodology for better assessing losses and gains

Assessing the environmental and social co-benefits and disbenefits of natural risk management measures

Nature-Based Engineering: A Review on Reducing Coastal Flood Risk With Mangroves

Assessing the effects of using high-quality data and high-resolution models in valuing flood protection services of mangroves