Abstract:In this article, we present a new way of matching in observational studies that overcomes three limitations of existing matching approaches. First, it directly balances covariates with multi-valued treatments without explicitly estimating the generalized propensity score. Second, it builds self-weighted matched samples that are representative of a target population by design. Third, it can handle large datasets, with hundreds of thousands of observations, in a couple of minutes. The key insights of this new approach to matching are balancing the treatment groups relative to a target population and positing a linear-sized mixed integer formulation of the matching problem. We formally show that this formulation is more effective than alternative quadratic-sized formulations, as its reduction in size does not affect its strength from the standpoint of its linear programming relaxation. We also show that this formulation can be used for matching with distributional covariate balance in polynomial time under certain assumptions on the covariates and that it can handle large datasets in practice even when the assumptions are not satisfied. This algorithmic characterization is key to handling large datasets. We illustrate this new approach to matching in both a simulation study and an observational study of the impact of an earthquake on educational attainment. With this approach, the results after matching can be visualized with simple and transparent graphical displays: while increasing levels of exposure to the earthquake have a negative impact on school attendance, there is no effect on college admission test scores. <a class="ext-link" href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2020.1753532">Supplementary materials</a> for this article are available online.

Matching with multiple control groups with adjustment for group differences

Matching with Multiple Control Groups with Adjustment for Group Differences

Matching methods for causal inference: Designing observational studies

Matching Algorithms for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments

Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score

Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward

Building Representative Matched Samples With Multi-Valued Treatments in Large Observational Studies

Estimating causal effects of treatments in experimental and observational studies

Best practices in quasi-experimental designs

Matching Bounds: How Choice of Matching Algorithm Impacts Treatment Effects Estimates and What to Do about It

Controlling bias in observational studies: A review

Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies

Matching Estimators for Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments

Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies

Comparing Covariate Prioritization via Matching to Machine Learning Methods for Causal Inference using Five Empirical Applications

Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference

Matching to remove bias in observational studies

The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies

A groupwise approach for inferring heterogeneous treatment effects in causal inference