Abstract:Background: Submitting research abstracts to scientific societies is expected in academic medicine and requires dedicated time and effort. The authors queried mentors and mentees to ascertain what topics and proposed strategies should be included in a new curriculum to enhance the abstract submission process. Methods: Between May 2019 and March 2020, the authors enrolled 14 senior-rank mentors from diverse disciplines at a tertiary musculoskeletal center and their 14-paired mentees (mostly residents and fellows) into a several-component qualitative study consisting of in-depth interviews several months before abstract submission addressing prior experiences, and longitudinal follow-up interviews 1 month before, 1 week before, and 1 week after submission to uncover challenges faced during the actual process and strategies that were effective in overcoming these challenges. Additional contacts occurred through November 2020 to ascertain outcomes of submissions. Mentors and mentees were unaware of each other's responses. Responses were grouped into categories using grounded theory and a comparative analytic strategy. Results: At enrollment participants recounted details from prior abstracts that included experiences with the submission process such as format, content, and online requirements, and experiences with interpersonal interactions such as managing coinvestigators' competing priories and consulting with statisticians in a timely manner. Benefits of submitting abstracts included advancing mentees' careers and increasing research methodology rigor. Challenges encountered during the submission process included meeting deadlines before all data were acquired, time away from other responsibilities, and uncertainty about handling changing conclusions as more data accrued. Delayed feedback from coinvestigators and broadening the scope or changing the focus of the abstract compounded the time crunch to meet the submission deadline. At the time of abstract submission mentor-mentee pairs agreed that major challenges were dealing with collaborators, incomplete data/limited results, and different work styles. The authors developed a proposal for a comprehensive curriculum to include organizational, technical and interpersonal topics. Conclusions: This longitudinal qualitative study involving mentor-mentee pairs revealed multiple benefits and challenges associated with submitting research abstracts. These findings provide the foundation for a comprehensive curriculum to enhance this recurring labor-intensive undertaking and cornerstone of academic medicine.

Engaging medical students in urological academic research

Medical Student Mentorship in Surgery: Lessons Learnt and Future Directions

Implementation of a Urologic Surgery Skills Fair for Medical Students

Medical student mentoring programs: current insights

Strategies to Encourage Medical Student Interest in Urology

The Benefits of Being a "Buddy": Exploring the Medical Student Experience As Mentor to Minority High-School Students

Medical students' research - facilitators and barriers

A prospective cohort study on the role of surgical mentorship on medical students' surgical experience and attitudes towards surgery

Building a Physician-Scientist Pathway for Underrepresented Medical Students Through a Summer Research Experience

The next generation of physician-researchers: undergraduate medical students' and residents' attitudes, challenges, and approaches towards addressing them

Promoting positive perceptions of and motivation for research among undergraduate medical students to stimulate future research involvement: a grounded theory study

A Fully Online Research Practicum Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Students: A Protocol Paper

Paving the Way for Medical Students: How Smooth Should the Road Be?

Beyond the curriculum: unveiling medical students' drivers and barriers to research participation at Alfaisal University

Role of non-government organizations in engaging medical students in research

Developing a framework for promoting interest and engagement of scholarship of teaching and learning for medical students

Future physician-scientists: could we catch them young? Factors influencing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for research among first-year medical students

Early Exposure of Medical Students to a Formal Research Program Promotes Successful Scholarship in a Multi-Campus Medical School

Longitudinal qualitative study of paired mentor-mentee perspectives on the abstract submission process

A Mentorship-Based Surgery Clerkship: A Prospective Study Investigating Student Satisfaction

Perceived Effectiveness of a Surgical High School Outreach Program on Career Trajectory of Underserved High School Students