Abstract:Background A valid and efficient stress measure is important for clinical and community settings. The objectives of this study were to translate the English version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) into Chinese and to assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PSQ (C-PSQ). The C-PSQ evaluates subjective experiences of stress instead of a specific and objective status. Methods Forward translations and back translations were used to translate the PSQ into Chinese. We used the C-PSQ to survey 2798 medical students and workers at three study sites in China from 2015 to 2017. Applying Rasch analysis (RA) and factor analysis (FA), we examined the measurement properties of the C-PSQ. Data were analyzed using the Rasch model for item fit, local dependence (LD), differential item functioning (DIF), unidimensionality, separation and reliability, response forms and person-item map. We first optimized the item selection in the Chinese version to maximize its psychometric quality. Second, we used cross-validation, by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), to determine the best fitting model in comparison to the different variants. Measurement invariance (MI) was tested using multi-group CFA across subgroups (medical students vs. medical workers). We evaluated validity of the C-PSQ using the criterion instruments, such as the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the Short Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8) and the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS). Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, Guttman’s lambda-2, and McDonald’s omegas) and reproducibility (test–retest correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient, [ICC]). Results Infit and/or outfit values indicated that all items fitted the Rasch model. Three item pairs presented local dependency (residual correlations > 0.30). Ten items showed DIF. Dimensionality instruction suggested that eight items should be deleted. One item showed low discrimination. Thirteen items from the original PSQ were retained in the C-PSQ adaptation (i.e. C-PSQ-13). We tested and verified four feasible models to perform EFA. Built on the EFA models, the optimal CFA model included two first-order factors (i.e. constraint and imbalance) and a second-order factor (i.e., perceived stress). The first-order model had acceptable goodness of fit (Normed Chi-square = 8.489, TLI = 0.957, CFI = 0.965, WRMR = 1.637, RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.078 [0.072, 0.084]). The second-order model showed identical model fit. Person separation index (PSI) and person reliability (PR) were 2.42 and 0.85, respectively. Response forms were adequate, item difficulty matched respondents’ ability levels, and unidimensionality was found in the two factors. Multi-group CFA showed validity of the optimal model. Concurrent validity of the C-PSQ-13 was 0.777, − 0.595 and 0.584 (Spearman correlation, P < 0.001, the same hereinafter) for the Chinese version of the PSS-10, SF-8, and GADS. For reliability analyses, internal consistency of the C-PSQ-13 was 0.878 (Cronbach’s alpha), 0.880 (Guttman’s lambda-2), and 0.880 (McDonald’s omegas); test–retest correlation and ICC were 0.782 and 0.805 in a 2-day interval, respectively. Conclusion The C-PSQ-13 shows good metric characteristics for most indicators, which could contribute to stress research given its validity and economy. This study also contributes to the evidence based regarding between-group factorial structure analysis.

Three Versions of the Perceived Stress Scale: Psychometric Evaluation in a Nationally Representative Sample of Chinese Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale in a community sample of Chinese

The Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: Development and Validation Amongst Medical Students and Workers

[Perceived Stress in General Public During Prevalence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and Its Impact on Health Behavior].

Psychological Distress in the Shadow of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Preliminary Development of an Assessment Scale.

Perceived Stress and Possible Stressors in the General Public in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Changing Trends of Mental and Behavioral Responses and Associations During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: a Panel Study

Mental Health and Psychosocial Function of General Population During the COVID‐19 Epidemic in China

Changes of College Students' Psychological Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Two-Wave Repeated Survey.

Uncertainty Stress, and Its Impact on Disease Fear and Prevention Behavior During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: A Panel Study.

Factors related to perceived stress during the COVID-19 epidemic context among the general population in China: A cross-sectional nationwide study

Sex differences and psychological stress: responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in China

Measuring psychological response to pandemics: Further psychometric investigation of the COVID Stress Scales

Psychometric properties and correlates of Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-10) in people with common mental disorders with different employment Statuses

Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10: A psychometric study in Chinese university students

Coping style, social support and psychological distress in the general Chinese population in the early stages of the COVID-19 epidemic

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Perceived Stress Scale

Psychological Stress and Gender Differences During COVID-19 Pandemic in Chinese Population

Using a Compiled Stress Response Questionnaire

Chinese public’s knowledge, perceived severity, and perceived controllability of COVID-19 and their associations with emotional and behavioural reactions, social participation, and precautionary behaviour: a national survey

An Internet Investigation of Mental Health Status of 1144 Different Status Identities in South China during Outbreak of COVID-19