Abstract:Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the factorial validity and reliability of the Pandemic Stressor Scale (PaSS), a new measure to assess the severity of distress for different stressors relevant during a pandemic or epidemic. Methods The PaSS was administered in N = 2760 German participants. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract factors. The factor structure obtained in the German sample was examined in N = 1021 Austrian participants using confirmatory factor analysis. χ 2 , RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, TLI were assessed as global goodness of fit indices for two models (Model 1: nine-factor model; Model 2: nine-factor model combined with a second-order general factor). We additionally assessed factor loadings, communalities, factor reliability, discriminant validity as local fit indices. Internal consistency, item discrimination, and item difficulty were assessed as additional test quality criteria. Results The results of the exploratory factor analysis suggested a nine-factor solution with factor loadings accounting for 50.4% of the total variance (Factor 1 ‘Problems with Childcare’, Factor 2 ‘Work-related Problems’, Factor 3 ‘Restricted Face-to-Face Contact’, Factor 4 ‘Burden of Infection ‘, Factor 5 ‘Crisis Management and Communication’, Factor 6 ‘Difficult Housing Condition’, Factor 7 ‘Fear of Infection’, Factor 8 ‘Restricted Access to Resources’, Factor 9 ‘Restricted Activity’). The confirmatory factor analysis showed a sufficient global fit for both tested models (Model 1: χ 2 (369, N = 1021) = 1443.28, p < .001, RMSEA = .053, SRMR = .055, CFI = .919, TLI = .904; Model 2: χ 2 (396, N = 1021) = 1948.51, p < .001, RMSEA = .062, SRMR = .074, CFI = .883, TLI = .871). The results of the chi-square difference test indicated a significantly better model-fit of Model 1 compared to Model 2 (∆χ 2 (27, N = 1021) = 505.23, p < .001). Local goodness of fit indices were comparable for both tested models. We found good factor reliabilities for all factors and moderate to large factor loadings of the items as indicators. In Model 2, four first-order factors showed small factor loadings on the second-order general factor. Conclusion The Pandemic Stressor Scale showed sufficient factorial validity for the nine measured domains of stressors during the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Measuring psychological response to pandemics: Further psychometric investigation of the COVID Stress Scales

Three Versions of the Perceived Stress Scale: Psychometric Evaluation in a Nationally Representative Sample of Chinese Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Subjective Stress Appraisals Over Time: the Evolving Structure of the COVID-19 Stressor Scale

Is there evidence for factorial invariance of the COVID Stress Scales? an analysis of North American and cross-cultural populations

Measuring Psychosocial Reactions to COVID-19: The COVID Reaction Scales (COVID-RS) as a New Assessment Tool

Differential production of granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor by macrophages from mice susceptible and resistant to Leishmania mexicana amazonensis

The Pandemic Stressor Scale: factorial validity and reliability of a measure of stressors during a pandemic

Examining the psychometric properties of the CEFIS-AYA using item response theory

Effects of steroid hormones on drug-metabolizing enzyme systems in liver microsomes.

Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Stress and strain profiles in the German population

Temporal Changes in Mental Response and Prevention Patterns, and Their Impact from Uncertainty Stress During the Transition in China from the COVID-19 Epidemic to Sporadic Infection

The Development and Validation of a Measure to Assess COVID-19 Stress among College Students for Sustainable Education

Cross-cultural Investigation of COVID-19 Related Acute Stress: A Network Analysis.

The pandemic coping scale – validity and reliability of a brief measure of coping during a pandemic

COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates

Changing Trends of Mental and Behavioral Responses and Associations During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: a Panel Study

Development and Evaluation of an Out-of-Control Scale Measuring Global Contextual Stressors Across 20 Countries and Regions

Epicardial fat, rather than pericardial fat, is independently associated with diastolic filling in subjects without apparent heart disease.

Exposure to COVID‐19 pandemic stress: Associations with depression and anxiety in emerging adults in the United States

Validation of the Parent-report Pandemic Anxiety Scale (PAS-P) in the context of COVID-19

Measuring Caribbean stress and resilient coping: Psychometric properties of the PSS-10 and BRCS in a multi-country study during the COVID-19 pandemic