Abstract:As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies rapidly advance, they bring about important societal implications involving privacy, fairness, non-discrimination, and other relevant ethical considerations. Legislators and policymakers are joined by a common drive to provide legislative solutions and regulatory frameworks that guarantee that the ongoing integration of AI systems into society is consistent with fundamental rights and democratic values. This article explores the significant role that standardisation plays in this regulatory process and how it impacts the regulation and governance of AI within the European Union (EU). In particular, the paper provides a critical analysis of the regulatory approach adopted by the EU legislator for the AI Act, which delegates the definition of essential requirements for high-risk AI systems to harmonised standards, underlining the significance of standardisation in ensuring technical feasibility and compliance with EU laws and values. At the forefront of this discussion, there is the increasing influence of AI-related standardisation across social, economic, and geopolitical domains, with a particular focus on the crucial role played by Standard Developing Organisations (SDOs) in the regulatory and governance processes. This paper contributes to the legal scholarship by critically analysing the regulatory approach chosen for the EU’s AI Act, contesting the adequacy of the New Legislative Framework for AI governance, and arguing that the reliance on harmonised standards risks undermining democratic accountability and fails to sufficiently safeguard fundamental rights without a more inclusive and transparent standard-setting process. The article focuses on the exclusion of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) from the European Commission’s standardisation request in support of the AI Act and assesses its potential impact on EU law-making and regulatory consistency. Ultimately, the analysis aims to contribute to understanding standardisation dynamics, offering insights into its profound implications for AI governance and the broader digital sphere.

Considering Fundamental Rights in the European Standardisation of Artificial Intelligence: Nonsense or Strategic Alliance?

The Role of ETSI in the EU’s Regulation and Governance of Artificial Intelligence

Standardizing AI - The Case of the European Commission's Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act

First Analysis of the EU Artifical Intelligence Act: Towards a Global Standard for Trustworthy AI?

Questioning the EU proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act: The need for prohibitions and a stricter approach to biometric surveillance

Three pathways for standardisation and ethical disclosure by default under the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act

Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence and Technical Standardisation

Human vs. Artificial intelligence: EU's legal response

Offering false security: How the draft artificial intelligence act undermines fundamental workers rights

Foundations for the future: institution building for the purpose of artificial intelligence governance

The AI Act proposal: a new right to technical interpretability?

How the EU Can Achieve Legally Trustworthy AI: A Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act

AI Regulation in Europe: From the AI Act to Future Regulatory Challenges

European mechanisms for the protection of human rights in the field of artificial intelligence technologies (hereinafter - AI)

The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously

The European Commitment to Human-Centered Technology: The Integral Role of HCI in the EU AI Act's Success

Artificial intelligence governance in smart cities: A European regulatory perspective

The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS)

EU Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges for Patients’ Rights

The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview

The EU AI Act As Global Artificial Intelligence Regulation