Abstract:This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial Intelligence Act. It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and approach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. A definition of key concepts follows, and then the material and territorial scope, as well as the timing of application, are analyzed. Although the Regulation does not explicitly set out principles, the main ideas of fairness, accountability, transparency, and equity in AI underly a set of rules of the regulation. This is discussed before looking at the ill-defined set of forbidden AI practices (manipulation and e exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, biometric identification and classification, and predictive policing). It is highlighted that those rules deal with behaviors rather than AI systems. The qualification and regulation of high-risk AI systems are tackled, alongside the obligation of transparency for certain systems, the regulation of general-purpose models, and the rules on certification, supervision, and sanctions. The text concludes that even if the overall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so complex that it risks defeating its own purpose of promoting responsible innovation within the European Union and beyond its borders.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the legislative framework, objectives, and possible challenges during the implementation process of the EU's Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). Specifically, the paper explores this issue through the following aspects:
1. **Legislative Structure and Objectives**: The paper first introduces the main structure, objectives, and methods of the AI Act, that is, by establishing a unified set of rules to regulate the application of artificial intelligence technology, in order to promote responsible innovation and ensure the safety, transparency, and fairness of artificial intelligence systems.
2. **Definition of Key Concepts**: Subsequently, the paper defines some key concepts in the act, such as "artificial intelligence system", "subject", etc. These definitions are crucial for understanding the specific provisions of the act.
3. **Scope of Application**: The paper analyzes the material and territorial scope of application of the act, as well as its effective time, ensuring that readers understand which fields and regions will be affected by this act.
4. **Basic Principles**: Although the act itself does not explicitly list the principles, the paper points out that concepts such as fairness, responsibility, transparency, and justice run through all the provisions of the act.
5. **Prohibited Behaviors**: The paper discusses in detail the prohibited behaviors stipulated in the act, including manipulation and exploitation of loopholes, social scoring, biometrics and classification, predictive policing, etc., emphasizing that these provisions target specific behaviors rather than the artificial intelligence system itself.
6. **High - risk Systems**: The paper explores the qualification determination and regulatory requirements of high - risk artificial intelligence systems, including transparency obligations, regulation of general models, and provisions on certification, supervision, and punishment.
7. **Conclusion**: Finally, the paper concludes that although the overall framework can be regarded as appropriate and balanced, due to its complexity, it may hinder its goal of promoting responsible innovation within and outside the EU.
Through the above analysis, the paper aims to provide readers with a comprehensive and critical overview of the AI Act, helping to understand and evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of this act in practical applications.