Abstract:Studies of the biology of music (as of language) are highly interdisciplinary and demand the integration of diverse strands of evidence. In this paper, I present a comparative perspective on the biology and evolution of music, stressing the value of comparisons both with human language, and with those animal communication systems traditionally termed "song". A comparison of the "design features" of music with those of language reveals substantial overlap, along with some important differences. Most of these differences appear to stem from semantic, rather than structural, factors, suggesting a shared formal core of music and language. I next review various animal communication systems that appear related to human music, either by analogy (bird and whale "song") or potential homology (great ape bimanual drumming). A crucial comparative distinction is between learned, complex signals (like language, music and birdsong) and unlearned signals (like laughter, ape calls, or bird calls). While human vocalizations clearly build upon an acoustic and emotional foundation shared with other primates and mammals, vocal learning has evolved independently in our species since our divergence with chimpanzees. The convergent evolution of vocal learning in other species offers a powerful window into psychological and neural constraints influencing the evolution of complex signaling systems (including both song and speech), while ape drumming presents a fascinating potential homology with human instrumental music. I next discuss the archeological data relevant to music evolution, concluding on the basis of prehistoric bone flutes that instrumental music is at least 40,000 years old, and perhaps much older. I end with a brief review of adaptive functions proposed for music, concluding that no one selective force (e.g., sexual selection) is adequate to explaining all aspects of human music. I suggest that questions about the past function of music are unlikely to be answered definitively and are thus a poor choice as a research focus for biomusicology. In contrast, a comparative approach to music promises rich dividends for our future understanding of the biology and evolution of music.

How different are the differences? A commentary on the paper "Beat-based dancing to music has evolutionary foundations in vocal learning"

Response to commentaries by Schmidt and Kaplan, Penhune, Hickok and Theofanopoulou on "Beat-based dancing to music has evolutionary foundations in advanced vocal learning."

Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal

The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspective

The Evolution of Music in Comparative Perspective

Tapping into the vocal learning and rhythmic synchronization hypothesis

Monkeys have rhythm

Finding the Beat: From Socially Coordinated Vocalizations in Songbirds to Rhythmic Entrainment in Humans

Acoustic Processing and the Origin of Human Vocal Communication

The evolution of musicality and cross-domain co-evolutionary interactions

Interactive rhythms across species: the evolutionary biology of animal chorusing and turn‐taking

The "coordination conjecture" as an alternative to Patel's fortuitous enhancement hypothesis for the relation between vocal learning and beat-based dancing

‘How can we know the dancer from the dance?’ Perspectives on Musicality in Human Movement

Spontaneity and diversity of movement to music are not uniquely human

A hypothesis on the biological origins and social evolution of music and dance

Rhythmic entrainment: Why humans want to, fireflies can't help it, pet birds try, and sea lions have to be bribed

On the value of diverse organisms in auditory research: From fish to flies to humans

Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception

Resonance and beat perception of ballroom dancers: An EEG study

The origins of music in auditory scene analysis and the roles of evolution and culture in musical creation

Lessons learned in animal acoustic cognition through comparisons with humans