Abstract:Coordinating with others is part of our everyday experience. Previous studies using sensorimotor coordination games suggest that human dyads develop coordination strategies that can be interpreted as Nash equilibria. However, if the players are uncertain about what their partner is doing, they develop coordination strategies which are robust to the actual partner’s actions. This has suggested that humans select their actions based on an explicit prediction of what the partner will be doing – a partner model – which is probabilistic by nature. However, the mechanisms underlying the development of a joint coordination over repeated trials remain unknown. Very much like sensorimotor adaptation of individuals to external perturbations (eg force fields or visual rotations), dynamical models may help to understand how joint coordination develops over repeated trials. Here we present a general computational model – based on game theory and Bayesian estimation – designed to understand the mechanisms underlying the development of a joint coordination over repeated trials. Joint tasks are modeled as quadratic games, where each participant’s task is expressed as a quadratic cost function. Each participant predicts their partner’s next move (partner model) by optimally combining predictions and sensory observations, and selects their actions through a stochastic optimization of its expected cost, given the partner model. The model parameters include perceptual uncertainty (sensory noise), partner representation (retention rate and process noise), uncertainty in action selection and its rate of decay (which can be interpreted as the action’s learning rate). The model can be used in two ways: (i) to simulate interactive behaviors, thus helping to make specific predictions in the context of a given joint action scenario; and (ii) to analyze the action time series in actual experiments, thus providing quantitative metrics that describe individual behaviors during an actual joint action. We demonstrate the model in a variety of joint action scenarios. In a sensorimotor version of the Stag Hunt game, the model predicts that different representations of the partner lead to different Nash equilibria. In a joint two via-point (2-VP) reaching task, in which the actions consist of complex trajectories, the model captures well the observed temporal evolution of performance. For this task we also estimated the model parameters from experimental observations, which provided a comprehensive characterization of individual dyad participants. Computational models of joint action may help identifying the factors preventing or facilitating the development of coordination. They can be used in clinical settings, to interpret the observed behaviors in individuals with impaired interaction capabilities. They may also provide a theoretical basis to devise artificial agents that establish forms of coordination that facilitate neuromotor recovery.

The "coordination conjecture" as an alternative to Patel's fortuitous enhancement hypothesis for the relation between vocal learning and beat-based dancing

Response to commentaries by Schmidt and Kaplan, Penhune, Hickok and Theofanopoulou on "Beat-based dancing to music has evolutionary foundations in advanced vocal learning."

How different are the differences? A commentary on the paper "Beat-based dancing to music has evolutionary foundations in vocal learning"

Moving in time: Bayesian causal inference explains movement coordination to auditory beats

Coordination dynamics of multi-agent interaction in a musical ensemble

The spontaneous emergence of rhythmic coordination in turn taking

Dance on the Brain: Enhancing Intra- and Inter-Brain Synchrony

Toward Understanding the Brain Dynamics of Music: Learning and Conscious Performance of Lyrics and Melodies With Variable Rhythms and Beats

Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal

Dynamic models for musical rhythm perception and coordination

Finding the Beat: From Socially Coordinated Vocalizations in Songbirds to Rhythmic Entrainment in Humans

Beat-It: Beat-Synchronized Multi-Condition 3D Dance Generation

Computational joint action: dynamical models to understand the development of joint coordination

‘How can we know the dancer from the dance?’ Perspectives on Musicality in Human Movement

Audiovisual integration of rhythm in musicians and dancers

Tapping into the vocal learning and rhythmic synchronization hypothesis

May the Dance be with You: Dance Generation Framework for Non-Humanoids

Self-organized complementary joint action: Behavioral dynamics of an interpersonal collision-avoidance task.

Dual Learning Music Composition and Dance Choreography

One Step at a Time: Does Gradualism Build Coordination?

Motor and Predictive Processes in Auditory Beat and Rhythm Perception