Abstract:This study found distinct productivity and collaboration patterns of pre‐Nobel laureates significantly different from other NIH‐funded researchers. Characteristics of productivity and collaborations of pre‐Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine, including journal impact factor, publications, National Institutes of Health (NIH)‐funded grants, patents, coinventors, and coauthors at each academic age can be used as a reference guide for emerging researchers to compare one's research productivity and collaboration patterns with pre‐Nobel laureates. Significant advancements in public health come from scientific discoveries, but more are needed to meet the ever‐growing societal needs. Examining the best practices of outstanding scientists may help develop future researchers and lead to more discoveries. This study compared the comprehensive work of 49 Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine from 2000 to 2019 to a matched control of National Institutes of Health (NIH)‐funded biomedical investigators. Our unique data set, comprising 11,737 publications, 571 US patents, and 1693 NIH research awards produced by pre‐Nobel laureates, was compared to a similar data set of control researchers. Compared to control researchers, pre‐Nobel laureates produce significantly more publications annually (median = 5.66; interquartile range [IQR] = 5.16); significantly fewer coauthors per publication (median = 3.32; IQR = 1.95); consistently higher Journal Impact Factor publications (median = 12.04; IQR = 6.83); and substantially more patents per researcher (median = 5; IQR = 14). Such differences arose from nearly identical cumulative NIH award budgets of pre‐Nobel laureates (median ‐ ‐ 100 M cumulative). An academic age–specific trajectory graph allows aspiring researchers to compare their productivity and collaboration patterns to those of pre‐Nobel laureates.

Trajectories of biomedical research leading to Nobel Prize–winning discoveries

Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact

Bibliometric comparison of Nobel Prize laureates in physiology or medicine and chemistry

Bibliometric comparison of Nobel Prize laureates: a few suggestions

Impact of major awards on the subsequent work of their recipients

Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research

Dynamics and characteristics of interdisciplinary research in scientific breakthroughs: case studies of Nobel-winning research in the past 120 years

Work honored by Nobel prizes clusters heavily in a few scientific fields

Understanding Nobel Prize-Winning Articles:A Bibliometric Analysis

Once highly productive, forever highly productive? Full professors' research productivity from a longitudinal perspective

Disparities in funding for Nobel Prize awards in medicine and physiology across nationalities, races, and gender

Analysis of NIH K99/R00 awards and the career progression of awardees

Evolution of National Nobel Prize Shares in the 20th Century

Mapping the scientific and technological landscape: an analysis of Nobel Prize-producing institutions

Universal productivity patterns in research careers

Preprint: Institutional Value of a Nobel Prize

How Does Nobel Prize Awarding Shift the Research Topics of Nobelists’ Coauthors and Non-Coauthors?

The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory

Quantifying Lifetime Productivity Changes: A Longitudinal Study of 320,000 Late-Career Scientists

The pediatric surgeon-scientist: An evolving Breed or endangered phenotype?

Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline