The pediatric surgeon-scientist: An evolving Breed or endangered phenotype?

Nikhil R. Shah,Keerthi Burgi,Dimitra M. Lotakis,Niki Matusko,Erika A. Newman,Samir K. Gadepalli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.028
IF: 3.125
2024-05-09
The American Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Introduction National Institute of Health (NIH) funding is a "gold-standard" of achievement; we examined trends in NIH-funded pediatric surgeons. Methods NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) was queried for American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) members (2012 vs 2022). Demographics and time-to-award (TTA) from fellowship were compared. Number of grants, funding allotment, award classification, administering institutes/centers, research type were studied. Results Thirty-eight (4.6%) APSA members were NIH-funded in 2012 compared to 37 (2.9%) in 2022. Of funded surgeons in 2022, 27% were repeat awardees from 2012. TTA was similar (12 vs 14years, p=0.109). At each point, awards were commonly R01 grants (40 vs 52%, p ​= ​0.087) and basic science-related (76 vs 63%, p = ​0.179). Awardees were predominantly men (82% in 2012 vs 78% in 2022, p=0.779) and White (82% in 2012 vs 76% in 2022, p=0.586). Median amount per grant increased: 364,025 (2022); by 390,911 for women. Median awards for White surgeons increased by 30,074 for non-White surgeons, though not significantly (p=0.368). Conclusion The landscape of NIH-funded pediatric surgeons has remained unchanged between time points. With a substantial number of repeat awardees, predominance of R01 grants, and a median TTA over a decade after fellowship graduation, the phenotypes of early career pediatric surgeon-scientists are facing academic endangerment.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?