0600 Baseline Decisional Conflict and 3-Month Decision Regret Among Patients Considering Sleep Surgery

Allison Ikeda,Edward Weaver
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0600
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Sleep surgery has a role as secondary or adjunctive treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) after unsuccessful trial of CPAP therapy. In the shared decision-making process, patients are informed of the potential benefits, expected course, and potential risks of surgery. We believe that the careful consideration of these competing issues can increase decisional conflict initially but reduce decision regret subsequently. We hypothesized that patients considering sleep surgery who have higher baseline decisional conflict will have lower 3-month decision regret after making a choice, whether or not they proceed with surgery. Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive adult patients considering sleep surgery for OSA after difficulty with CPAP therapy. After surgery consultation, patients completed the validated Decisional Conflict Scale (16 items, score range 0-100, higher worse, >20 clinically important). At 3-months after surgery (surgery group) or 3-months after the consultation (control group), patients completed the validated Decision Regret Scale (5 items, score range 0-100, higher worse). Records were extracted for other variables. Linear regression analyses tested the associations between baseline Decisional Conflict and 3-month Decision Regret after adjusting for age, sex, race, Functional Comorbidity Index, type of sleep surgery, and history of sleep surgery. Results The cohort (N=157) characteristics include mean age 41+/-13 years, 60% males, and apnea-hypopnea index 26+/-22. For the whole cohort, baseline Decisional Conflict was 20+/-17 (borderline conflict), 3-month Decision Regret was 19+/-20 (mild regret), and there was no association between the two variables (adjusted R2=0.001, p=0.2). The surgery group had lower baseline Decisional Conflict and lower 3-month Decision Regret compared to the control group, but there was no association between baseline Decisional Conflict and 3-month Decision Regret in either group (R2=0.01 and 0.02). Conclusion Baseline decisional conflict was not associated with 3-month decision regret, whether or not surgery was chosen. The lack of association may be due to the low baseline decisional conflict, low 3-month decision regret, or other factors impacting decisional conflict (eg, choice predisposition, prior knowledge, risk aversiveness) or decision regret (eg, clinical outcome, adverse effects). Future work includes testing predictors of baseline decisional conflict and subsequent decision regret independently. Support (if any) American Academy of Otolaryngology Resident Research Award
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?