Abstract:Importance: This study adds to the literature on the efficacy and low complication rates associated with minimally invasive, single-stage, multilevel surgery for Asian adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) for whom conservative treatment had failed. Overall, our experience has produced results that make this procedure an option for select patients with snoring and OSA.Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of anatomy-based, minimally invasive, single-stage, multilevel surgery in the treatment of OSA in an Asian population.Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective study enrolled 59 consecutive patients with OSA from a tertiary academic medical center who had multilevel obstruction and unsuccessful conservative therapy and then underwent minimally invasive, single-stage, multilevel surgery. The subjective symptoms and objective polysomnographic findings were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively. The Global Patient Assessment questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction after minimally invasive, single-stage, multilevel surgery.Main Outcomes and Measures: Scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and bed partner evaluation of patient's snoring on a visual analog scale (scale of 0-10, with 0 indicating no snoring and 10 indicating the bed partner to leave the room or sleep separately, as assessed by the bed partner). The primary outcomes are a 50% decrease in bed partner's snoring visual analog scale level postoperatively and an improvement of 50% or more in apnea-hypopnea index by an at least 3-month follow-up. Adverse events and patient-reported quality measures were also assessed.Results: Forty-seven patients (36 men and 11 women; mean [SD], 47.3 [10.9] years) with a minimum 3-month follow-up and complete data were included in the analysis. None of the patients had serious perioperative or postoperative complications. Three months postoperatively, the mean (SD) scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and bed partner evaluation of patient's snoring on the visual analog scale decreased from 11.6 (4.3) to 9.2 (3.1), with a mean (SD) difference of -2.4 (3.7) (95% CI, -3.5 to -1.3), and 9.4 (1.5) to 3.9 (1.9), with a mean (SD) difference of -5.6 (2.0) (95% CI, -6.2 to -5.0), respectively. The mean (SD) apnea-hypopnea index and lowest oxygen saturation changed from 30.5 (18.8) to 26.0 (16.5), with a mean (SD) difference of -4.5 (14.1) (95% CI, -8.6 to -0.3), and 78.2% (9.9%) to 80.8% (8.2%), with a mean (SD) difference of +2.6 (8.7) (95% CI, 0-5.1), respectively. The surgical response rate was 46.8% (22 of 47 patients) (95% CI, 32.5%-61.1%). The success rate by the classic definition was 14.9% (7 of 47 patients) (95% CI, 6.2%-28.3%).Conclusions and Relevance: This study reveals the improvement of the 2 relevant clinical outcomes in snoring severity and daytime sleepiness after minimally invasive, single-stage, multilevel surgery for patients with OSA but the limited effects on the polysomnographic parameters. Although the current role of minimally invasive, single-stage, multilevel surgery for Asian adults with OSA remains to be established, it is hoped that ongoing and future studies will solidify their role in the treatment of OSA.

Comparison of surgical outcomes of sleep surgeries preoperatively evaluated with drug-induced sleep endoscopy and Müller's maneuver

Can drug-induced sleep endoscopy improve the success rates of tongue base surgery?

Preoperative Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy Improves the Surgical Approach to Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Surgical failure guided by DISE in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Insights into Friedman Stage II and III OSA Patients Through Drug- Induced Sleep Endoscopy

Comparison of upper airway collapse patterns and its clinical significance: drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients without obstructive sleep apnea, positional and non-positional obstructive sleep apnea

Comparative Study of VOTE Classification in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome Patients Between Awake and Sleep State

Does drug-induced sleep endoscopy change the surgical decision in surgically naïve non-syndromic children with snoring/sleep disordered breathing from the standard adenotonsillectomy? A retrospective cohort study

Interobserver Consistency of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy in Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using a VOTE Classification System

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Evaluation of a Selection Tool for Treatment Modalities for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Role of functional and anatomic study in sleep endoscopy for treatment of OSA

Comparison of clinical features and surgical outcomes between hypopnea‐ and apnea‐predominant obstructive sleep apnea

A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus propofol during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in sleep apnea patients

Comprehensive evaluation on the effect of simultaneous multi-level surgery for moderate to severe OSAHS

A Comparative Study on Efficacy and Safety of Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine in Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A CONSORT-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Minimally Invasive, Single-Stage, Multilevel Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Asian Patients

[Redefine the Efficacy of Surgical Treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome].

The Inverted-L Ramus Osteotomy Versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Maxillomandibular Advancement for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Short-term efficacy of surgical treatment of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

The Role of Obstruction Length and Height in Predicting Outcome of Velopharyngeal Surgery.

Evaluation of the Ocular Surface and Meibomian Gland in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome