Predictors of surgical outcomes for limited palatal muscle resection in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

JiWon Jang,Yong-Wan Kim,Ji-Hwan Park,Sue Jean Mun,Sung-Dong Kim,Kyu-Sup Cho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104110
Abstract:Objective: Limited palatal muscle resection (LPMR) is a modified palatal surgical technique to correct retropalatal obstruction without complications. This study aims to determine the associated factors affecting the success and cure rate of LPMR in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), thus guiding patient selection and improving surgical outcome. Methods: Thirty-five OSA patients underwent LPMR were enrolled. All patients received routine physical examination, preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), and polysomnography (PSG). Clinical, polysomnographic, cephalometric variables, and DISE findings were evaluated. These measurements were compared between the surgical success and failure group based on the results of preoperative and postoperative PSG. Furthermore, we compared the cured and non-cured groups in the surgical success group. Results: Among 35 patients, the overall success rate was 57 % with a cure rate of 31.4 %. Patients with Friedman stage II had a significantly higher success rate (p = 0.032). According to DISE results, tongue base obstruction affected the surgical outcome (p < 0.001). The success rate was 100 % in the no tongue base obstruction during DISE, 72.2 % in the partial obstruction, and 9.1 % in the total obstruction. Tonsil size is also helpful in predicting surgical success rate (p = 0.041). Furthermore, patients with mild AHI were more likely to be surgical cures. when compared with patients with severe AHI (p = 0.044). Conclusion: Patients with larger tonsil size and no tongue base obstruction during DISE may have a higher chance of surgical success with LPMR. The lower AHI may be predictors of surgical cure after LPMR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?