Abstract:Background Our understanding of the composition, function, and health implications of human microbiota has been advanced by high-throughput sequencing and the development of new genomic analyses. However, trade-offs among alternative strategies for the acquisition and analysis of sequence data remain understudied. Methods We assessed eight popular taxonomic profiling pipelines; MetaPhlAn2, metaMix, PathoScope 2.0, Sigma, Kraken, ConStrains, Centrifuge and Taxator-tk, against a battery of metagenomic datasets simulated from real data. The metagenomic datasets were modeled on 426 complete or permanent draft genomes stored in the Human Oral Microbiome Database and were designed to simulate various experimental conditions, both in the design of a putative experiment; read length (75–1,000 bp reads), sequence depth (100K–10M), and in metagenomic composition; number of species present (10, 100, 426), species distribution. The sensitivity and specificity of each of the pipelines under various scenarios were measured. We also estimated the relative root mean square error and average relative error to assess the abundance estimates produced by different methods. Additional datasets were generated for five of the pipelines to simulate the presence within a metagenome of an unreferenced species, closely related to other referenced species. Additional datasets were also generated in order to measure computational time on datasets of ever-increasing sequencing depth (up to 6 × 10 7 ). Results Testing of eight pipelines against 144 simulated metagenomic datasets initially produced 1,104 discrete results. Pipelines using a marker gene strategy; MetaPhlAn2 and ConStrains, were overall less sensitive, than other pipelines; with the notable exception of Taxator-tk. This difference in sensitivity was largely made up in terms of runtime, significantly lower than more sensitive pipelines that rely on whole-genome alignments such as PathoScope2.0. However, pipelines that used strategies to speed-up alignment between genomic references and metagenomic reads, such as kmerization, were able to combine both high sensitivity and low run time, as is the case with Kraken and Centrifuge. Absent species genomes in the database mostly led to assignment of reads to the most closely related species available in all pipelines. Our results therefore suggest that taxonomic profilers that use kmerization have largely superseded those that use gene markers, coupling low run times with high sensitivity and specificity. Taxonomic profilers using more time-consuming read reassignment, such as PathoScope 2.0, provided the most sensitive profiles under common metagenomic sequencing scenarios. All the results described and discussed in this paper can be visualized using the dedicated R Shiny application ( https://github.com/microgenomics/HumanMicrobiomeAnalysis ). All of our datasets, pipelines and results are made available through the GitHub repository for future benchmarking.

Challenges in benchmarking metagenomic profilers

Benchmarking Metagenomics Tools for Taxonomic Classification

Assessment of statistical methods from single cell, bulk RNA-seq, and metagenomics applied to microbiome data

Crowdsourced benchmarking of taxonomic metagenome profilers: lessons learned from the sbv IMPROVER Microbiomics challenge

Benchmarking taxonomic classifiers with Illumina and Nanopore sequence data for clinical metagenomic diagnostic applications

Benchmarking bacterial taxonomic classification using nanopore metagenomics data of several mock communities

Evaluation of computational methods for human microbiome analysis using simulated data

Challenges and best practices in omics benchmarking

On the limits of 16S rRNA gene-based metagenome prediction and functional profiling

Evaluating metagenomic analyses for undercharacterized environments: what's needed to light up the microbial dark matter?

Multicenter evaluation of gut microbiome profiling by next-generation sequencing reveals major biases in partial-length metabarcoding approach

A Benchmark of Genetic Variant Calling Pipelines Using Metagenomic Short-Read Sequencing

Cross-comparison of gut metagenomic profiling strategies

Metapresence: a tool for accurate species detection in metagenomics based on the genome-wide distribution of mapping reads

Scrutinizing key steps for reliable metabarcoding of environmental samples

Metagenomics versus total RNA sequencing: most accurate data-processing tools, microbial identification accuracy and perspectives for ecological assessments

Benchmarking differential abundance methods for finding condition-specific prototypical cells in multi-sample single-cell datasets

Metagenomic profiling pipelines improve taxonomic classification for 16S amplicon sequencing data

Multicenter assessment of microbial community profiling using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomic sequencing

Interpretations of Environmental Microbial Community Studies Are Biased by the Selected 16S rRNA (Gene) Amplicon Sequencing Pipeline

Metagenomics for taxonomy profiling: tools and approaches