Abstract:The Digital Services Act (DSA) requires large social media platforms in the EU to provide clear and specific information whenever they remove or restrict access to certain content. These "Statements of Reasons" (SoRs) are collected in the DSA Transparency Database to ensure transparency and scrutiny of content moderation decisions of the providers of online platforms. In this work, we empirically analyze 156 million SoRs within an observation period of two months to provide an early look at content moderation decisions of social media platforms in the EU. Our empirical analysis yields the following main findings: (i) There are vast differences in the frequency of content moderation across platforms. For instance, TikTok performs more than 350 times more content moderation decisions per user than X/Twitter. (ii) Content moderation is most commonly applied for text and videos, whereas images and other content formats undergo moderation less frequently. (ii) The primary reasons for moderation include content falling outside the platform's scope of service, illegal/harmful speech, and pornography/sexualized content, with moderation of misinformation being relatively uncommon. (iii) The majority of rule-breaking content is detected and decided upon via automated means rather than manual intervention. However, X/Twitter reports that it relies solely on non-automated methods. (iv) There is significant variation in the content moderation actions taken across platforms. Altogether, our study implies inconsistencies in how social media platforms implement their obligations under the DSA -- resulting in a fragmented outcome that the DSA is meant to avoid. Our findings have important implications for regulators to clarify existing guidelines or lay out more specific rules that ensure common standards on how social media providers handle rule-breaking content on their platforms.

Automated Content Moderation Increases Adherence to Community Guidelines

Moderation, Networks, and Anti-Social Behavior Online

Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A Theoretical Framework

Let Community Rules Be Reflected in Online Content Moderation

Understanding the (In)Effectiveness of Content Moderation: A Case Study of Facebook in the Context of the U.S. Capitol Riot

Beyond Trial-and-Error: Predicting User Abandonment After a Moderation Intervention

Post Guidance for Online Communities

Content Moderation on Social Media: Does It Matter Who and Why Moderates Hate Speech?

Content Moderation Justice and Fairness on Social Media: Comparisons Across Different Contexts and Platforms

Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance

How Are ML-Based Online Content Moderation Systems Actually Used? Studying Community Size, Local Activity, and Disparate Treatment.

Content Moderation on Social Media in the EU: Insights From the DSA Transparency Database

Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels

Platform Governance with Algorithm-Based Content Moderation: An Empirical Study on Reddit

Post Approvals in Online Communities

Social Media, Content Moderation, and Technology

Key to Kindness: Reducing Toxicity In Online Discourse Through Proactive Content Moderation in a Mobile Keyboard

Proactive Moderation of Online Discussions: Existing Practices and the Potential for Algorithmic Support

Measuring the Prevalence of Anti-Social Behavior in Online Communities

"Community Guidelines Make this the Best Party on the Internet": An In-Depth Study of Online Platforms' Content Moderation Policies

The Effect of Moderation on Online Mental Health Conversations