Abstract:Effective content moderation in online communities is often a delicate balance between maintaining content quality and fostering user participation. In this paper, we introduce post guidance, a novel approach to community moderation that proactively guides users' contributions using rules that trigger interventions as users draft a post to be submitted. For instance, rules can surface messages to users, prevent post submissions, or flag posted content for review. This uniquely community-specific, proactive, and user-centric approach can increase adherence to rules without imposing additional burdens on moderators. We evaluate a version of Post Guidance implemented on Reddit, which enables the creation of rules based on both post content and account characteristics, via a large randomized experiment, capturing activity from 97,616 posters in 33 subreddits over 63 days. We find that Post Guidance (1) increased the number of ``successful posts'' (posts not removed after 72 hours), (2) decreased moderators' workload in terms of manually-reviewed reports, (3) increased contribution quality, as measured by community engagement, and (4) had no impact on posters' own subsequent activity, within communities adopting the feature. Post Guidance on Reddit was similarly effective for community veterans and newcomers, with greater benefits in communities that used the feature more extensively. Our findings indicate that post guidance represents a transformative approach to content moderation, embodying a paradigm that can be easily adapted to other platforms to improve online communities across the Web.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to promote user participation while maintaining content quality in online community content management. Specifically, the authors propose a new community management method - **Post Guidance**, which aims to actively guide users' contributions through rules, thereby reducing the release of violating content and alleviating the workload of moderators.
### Main Problems and Solutions
1. **Balance between Maintaining Content Quality and Promoting User Participation**:
- Content management in online communities usually needs to find a delicate balance between maintaining high - quality content and encouraging users to participate actively.
- Although traditional automated tools can capture submissions that may deviate from community goals on a large scale, they may also lead to mis - deletions, making users dissatisfied and leaving the community.
- Manual review requires a great deal of time and energy and is difficult to cope with a large and continuous amount of content.
2. **Improve the Rate of Rule Compliance**:
- Many communities rely on post - hoc review mechanisms, that is, reviewing after users post content, which not only increases the workload of moderators but may also cause violating content to have already had a negative impact on the community.
- Community - specific, proactive, and user - centered methods can improve users' understanding and compliance with rules, thereby reducing the occurrence of violations.
### Proposed Solution: Post Guidance
- **Definition**: Post Guidance is a new type of community management method that allows moderators to create rules and trigger interventions when users are drafting content. These interventions can include displaying messages to users, blocking post submissions, or marking published posts for review.
- **Features**:
- **Community - Specific**: Rules can be customized according to the specific needs of each community.
- **Proactive**: Intervene before users submit content, rather than dealing with it afterwards.
- **User - Centric**: Help users better understand what content will be accepted, thereby improving their ability to post compliant content.
### Research Hypotheses
To verify the effectiveness of Post Guidance, the authors propose the following four hypotheses:
1. **H1**: Post Guidance will increase the number of contributions that are not removed in the communities that adopt this feature.
2. **H2**: Post Guidance will reduce the workload of moderators in the communities that adopt this feature.
3. **H3**: Post Guidance will improve the quality of contributions in the communities that adopt this feature.
4. **H4**: Post Guidance will increase user participation (activities other than posting) in the communities that adopt this feature.
### Experimental Results
The experimental results show that:
- **H1**: Post Guidance has increased the number of successful contributions (the number of posts not removed within 72 hours has increased by 5.8%), although it has reduced the number of posts that are started to be written and submitted.
- **H2**: Post Guidance has reduced the workload of moderators, and the number of times users' posts are reported and automatically removed has decreased significantly.
- **H3**: Post Guidance has improved the quality of contributions, as shown by more comments, views, and likes.
- **H4**: Post Guidance has not significantly increased user participation; instead, there is a slight downward trend in some aspects, but it is not statistically significant.
### Conclusions and Future Directions
As a scalable and flexible content management paradigm, Post Guidance has shown its potential in improving user - generated content. Future research can further expand this paradigm to adapt to more types of contributions and platforms and explore the use of machine - learning models to enhance its functions, such as handling a wider range of rules, multimedia content, and providing more personalized feedback.