Abstract:A critical step in protein biomarker discovery is the ability to contrast proteomes, a process referred generally as quantitative proteomics. While stable-isotope labeling (e.g., ICAT, 18O- or 15N-labeling, or AQUA) remains the core technology used in mass spectrometry-based proteomic quantification, increasing efforts have been directed to the label-free approach that relies on direct comparison of peptide peak areas between LC-MS runs. This latter approach is attractive to investigators for its simplicity as well as cost effectiveness. In the present study, the reproducibility and linearity of using a label-free approach to highly complex proteomes were evaluated. Various amounts of proteins from different proteomes were subjected to repeated LC-MS analyses using an ion trap or Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Highly reproducible data were obtained between replicated runs, as evidenced by nearly ideal Pearson's correlation coefficients (for ion's peak areas or retention time) and average peak area ratios. In general, more than 50% and nearly 90% of the peptide ion ratios deviated less than 10% and 20%, respectively, from the average in duplicate runs. In addition, the multiplicity ratios of the amounts of proteins used correlated nicely with the observed averaged ratios of peak areas calculated from detected peptides. Furthermore, the removal of abundant proteins from the samples led to an improvement in reproducibility and linearity. A computer program has been written to automate the processing of data sets from experiments with groups of multiple samples for statistical analysis. Algorithms for outlier-resistant mean estimation and for adjusting statistical significance threshold in multiplicity of testing were incorporated to minimize the rate of false positives. The program was applied to quantify changes in proteomes of parental and p53-deficient HCT-116 human cells and found to yield reproducible results. Overall, this study demonstrates an alternative approach that allows global quantification of differentially expressed proteins in complex proteomes. The utility of this method to biomarker discovery is likely to synergize with future improvements in the detecting sensitivity of mass spectrometers.

Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling.

Analysis of Quantitative Proteomic Data Generated via Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology

Relative, label-free protein quantitation: spectral counting error statistics from nine replicate MudPIT samples

Amino Acid Residue Specific Stable Isotope Labeling for Quantitative Proteomics

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Using a MALDI Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer

Peptide Mass Mapping Constrained with Stable Isotope-Tagged Peptides for Identification of Protein Mixtures

Cysteinyl peptide capture for shotgun proteomics: global assessment of chemoselective fractionation

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Protein Quantification Using Isotope TMPP-labeled Peptides

Label-Free Protein Quantification Using Lc-Coupled Ion Trap or Ft Mass Spectrometry: Reproducibility, Linearity, and Application with Complex Proteomes

A method combining SPITC and ¹⁸O labeling for simultaneous protein identification and relative quantification

Comparative Study of Three Proteomic Quantitative Methods, Dige, Cicat, and Itraq, Using 2d Gel- or Lc-Maldi Tof/Tof

A Mass Spectrometry Strategy for Protein Quantification Based on the Differential Alkylation of Cysteines Using Iodoacetamide and Acrylamide

Selective Maleylation-Directed Isobaric Peptide Termini Labeling for Accurate Proteome Quantification

Extensive Peptide Fractionation and Y(1) Ion-Based Interference Detection Method for Enabling Accurate Quantification by Isobaric Labeling and Mass Spectrometry

Isobaric Tagging and Data Independent Acquisition as Complementary Strategies for Proteome Profiling on an Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer

Relative And Absolute Quantitation In Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

Identification and Quantification of Basic and Acidic Proteins Using Solution-Based Two-Dimensional Protein Fractionation and Label-Free or 18O-Labeling Mass Spectrometry.

Protein Profiling by Capillary Isoelectric Focusing, Reversed‐phase Liquid Chromatography, and Mass Spectrometry

Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology

Systematic Assessment of Survey Scan and Ms2-Based Abundance Strategies for Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Using High-Resolution Ms Data

iTRAQ-labeling of in-gel digested proteins for relative quantification