Abstract:High resolution proteomics approaches have been successfully utilized for the comprehensive characterization of the cell proteome. However, in the case of quantitative proteomics an open question still remains, which quantification strategy is best suited for identification of biologically relevant changes, especially in clinical specimens. In this study, a thorough comparison of a label-free approach (intensity-based) and 8-plex iTRAQ was conducted as applied to the analysis of tumor tissue samples from non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For the latter, two acquisition strategies were tested including analysis of unfractionated and fractioned iTRAQ-labeled peptides. To reduce variability, aliquots of the same protein extract were used as starting material, whereas to obtain representative results per method further sample processing and MS analysis were conducted according to routinely applied protocols. Considering only multiple-peptide identifications, LC-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 910, 1092 and 332 proteins by label-free, fractionated and unfractionated iTRAQ, respectively. The label-free strategy provided higher protein sequence coverage compared to both iTRAQ experiments. Even though pre-fraction of the iTRAQ labeled peptides allowed for a higher number of identifications, this was not accompanied by a respective increase in the number of differentially expressed changes detected. Validity of the proteomics output related to protein identification and differential expression was determined by comparison to existing data in the field (Protein Atlas and published data on the disease). All methods predicted changes which to a large extent agreed with published data, with label-free providing a higher number of significant changes than iTRAQ. Conclusively, both label-free and iTRAQ (when combined to peptide fractionation) provide high proteome coverage and apparently valid predictions in terms of differential expression, nevertheless label-free provides higher sequence coverage and ultimately detects a higher number of differentially expressed proteins. The risk for receiving false associations still exists, particularly when analyzing highly heterogeneous biological samples, raising the need for the analysis of higher sample numbers and/or application of adjustment for multiple testing.

Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies

Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies.

Systematic Assessment of Survey Scan and Ms2-Based Abundance Strategies for Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Using High-Resolution Ms Data

Relative And Absolute Quantitation In Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

Comparative Study of Three Proteomic Quantitative Methods, Dige, Cicat, and Itraq, Using 2d Gel- or Lc-Maldi Tof/Tof

Label-Free Protein Quantification Using Lc-Coupled Ion Trap or Ft Mass Spectrometry: Reproducibility, Linearity, and Application with Complex Proteomes

Comparative analysis of different label-free mass spectrometry based protein abundance estimates and their correlation with RNA-Seq gene expression data.

Computational Analysis and Comparison of Continuous and Count-based Label-free Quantitative Proteomic Data

Refinements of LC-MS/MS Spectral Counting Statistics Improve Quantification of Low Abundance Proteins

Evaluation of Spectral Counting for Relative Quantitation of Proteoforms in Top-Down Proteomics

Isobaric Tagging and Data Independent Acquisition as Complementary Strategies for Proteome Profiling on an Orbitrap Astral Mass Spectrometer

The Effects of Nonignorable Missing Data on Label-Free Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Experiments.

Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling.

MSstatsPTM: Statistical Relative Quantification of Posttranslational Modifications in Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

Development of Antibacterial Compounds That Constrain Evolutionary Pathways to Resistance

The effects of non-ignorable missing data on label-free mass spectrometry proteomics

Relative, label-free protein quantitation: spectral counting error statistics from nine replicate MudPIT samples

Comparative analysis of MS/MS search algorithms in label-free shotgun proteomics for monitoring host-cell proteins using trapped ion mobility and ddaPASEF

Comparative Analysis of Label-Free and 8-Plex iTRAQ Approach for Quantitative Tissue Proteomic Analysis

Label--free Protein Quantification Methods in Proteomics Research

Interrogating data-independent acquisition LC-MS/MS for affinity proteomics