Abstract:Culture is a human universal, yet it is a source of variation in human psychology, behaviour and development. Developmental researchers are now expanding the geographical scope of research to include populations beyond relatively wealthy Western communities. However, culture and context still play a secondary role in the theoretical grounding of developmental psychology research, far too often. In this paper, we highlight four false assumptions that are common in psychology, and that detract from the quality of both standard and cross-cultural research in development. These assumptions are: (i) the universality assumption , that empirical uniformity is evidence for universality, while any variation is evidence for culturally derived variation; (ii) the Western centrality assumption , that Western populations represent a normal and/or healthy standard against which development in all societies can be compared; (iii) the deficit assumption , that population-level differences in developmental timing or outcomes are necessarily due to something lacking among non-Western populations; and (iv) the equivalency assumption , that using identical research methods will necessarily produce equivalent and externally valid data, across disparate cultural contexts. For each assumption, we draw on cultural evolutionary theory to critique and replace the assumption with a theoretically grounded approach to culture in development. We support these suggestions with positive examples drawn from research in development. Finally, we conclude with a call for researchers to take reasonable steps towards more fully incorporating culture and context into studies of development, by expanding their participant pools in strategic ways. This will lead to a more inclusive and therefore more accurate description of human development. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bridging cultural gaps: interdisciplinary studies in human cultural evolution’.

Toward a globally inclusive knowledge base on adolescent development: A charge to the Majority World and a plea for epistemic and paradigmatic pluralism

Towards a decolonial developmental science: Adolescent development in the Majority World taking center stage

Embracing the hidden potential: The contribution of majority world research to developmental science

Toward a decolonial developmental science in Asia: Exploring adolescent development in communities from the majority world

Common Challenges for All? A Critical Engagement with the Emerging Vision for Post‐pandemic Development Studies

The Western psychologization of global development: A cultural and decolonial approach

Cross-cultural, developmental psychology: Integrating approaches and key insights

Interrogating the epistemic dimension for new beginnings in early childhood care and education

To heal, grow, and thrive: Engaging Indigenous paradigms and perspectives in developmental science

Contributions of African Traditional Knowledge to Community Development Theory and Practice

Still the Dark Continent? Towards contextual methodological approaches to management development research in foreign multinational firms in Africa

Increasing Inclusivity in Developmental Research

Commentary: Revisiting developmental science research practices during a global crisis

Developmental psychopathology as a meta-paradigm: From zero-sum science to epistemological pluralism in theory and research

Research in Latin America from a decolonial perspective: Challenges of producing socially situated knowledge

Variation is the universal: making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology

Pluripotency of a founding field: rebranding developmental biology

Evolving Perspectives and Methodologies in Developmental Psychology

Fostering and sustaining transnational solidarities for transformative social change: Advancing community psychology research and action

‘Capacity for what? Capacity for whom?’ A decolonial deconstruction of research capacity development practices in the Global South and a proposal for a value-centred approach

Decolonizing and Diversifying Research in Cognitive Development