Abstract:Psychiatry has always been characterized by a range of different models of and approaches to mental disorder, which have sometimes brought progress in clinical practice, but have often also been accompanied by critique from within and without the field. Psychiatric nosology has been a particular focus of debate in recent decades; successive editions of the DSM and ICD have strongly influenced both psychiatric practice and research, but have also led to assertions that psychiatry is in crisis, and to advocacy for entirely new paradigms for diagnosis and assessment. When thinking about etiology, many researchers currently refer to a biopsychosocial model, but this approach has received significant critique, being considered by some observers overly eclectic and vague. Despite the development of a range of evidence‐based pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies, current evidence points to both a treatment gap and a research‐practice gap in mental health. In this paper, after considering current clinical practice, we discuss some proposed novel perspectives that have recently achieved particular prominence and may significantly impact psychiatric practice and research in the future: clinical neuroscience and personalized pharmacotherapy; novel statistical approaches to psychiatric nosology, assessment and research; deinstitutionalization and community mental health care; the scale‐up of evidence‐based psychotherapy; digital phenotyping and digital therapies; and global mental health and task‐sharing approaches. We consider the extent to which proposed transitions from current practices to novel approaches reflect hype or hope. Our review indicates that each of the novel perspectives contributes important insights that allow hope for the future, but also that each provides only a partial view, and that any promise of a paradigm shift for the field is not well grounded. We conclude that there have been crucial advances in psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in recent decades; that, despite this important progress, there is considerable need for further improvements in assessment and intervention; and that such improvements will likely not be achieved by any specific paradigm shifts in psychiatric practice and research, but rather by incremental progress and iterative integration.

Developmental psychopathology as a meta-paradigm: From zero-sum science to epistemological pluralism in theory and research

Developmental psychopathology turns 50: Applying core principles to longitudinal investigation of ADHD in girls and efforts to reduce stigma and discrimination

Taking stock to move forward: Where the field of developmental psychopathology might be heading

Developmental psychopathology: Our welcoming, inclusive, and eclectic intellectual home

The growing interdisciplinarity of developmental psychopathology: Implications for science and training

The next generation of developmental psychopathology research: Including broader perspectives and becoming more precise

Community-engaged research: Bringing the science of developmental psychopathology into the real world

Emergence and evolution of developmental resilience science over half a century

The future of neuroscience in developmental psychopathology

Cross-cultural, developmental psychology: Integrating approaches and key insights

Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: paradigm shifts versus incremental integration

A Critical Sociocultural Understanding of Evidence-Based Research and Practice Paradigm in Contemporary Psychology

Developmental perspectives on the origins of psychotic disorders: The need for a transdiagnostic approach

Beyond developmental psychopathology: Positive child development

The long and winding road: Pathways from basic research to implementation and evaluation

Toward a "new" paradigm of therapeutic action: neuro-psychoanalysis and downward causation

Evolving Perspectives and Methodologies in Developmental Psychology

Developmental Psychology in cultural historical context - overview and further reflections

Why developmental psychology is incomplete without comparative and cross-cultural perspectives

Integrating Development and Evolution in Psychological Science: Evolutionary Developmental Psychology, Developmental Systems, and Explanatory Pluralism

Positive Deviance Underlies Successful Science: Normative Methodologies Risk Throwing out the Baby With the Bathwater