Abstract:Background: Cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary care and case management can contribute to an improved integration of the primary care for patients with geriatric characteristics. Following this approach, the pilot study RubiN (Regional ununterbrochen betreut im Netz / Continuous Care in Regional Networks) implemented a specific geriatric Care and Case Management (CCM) in five certified practice networks of independent physicians in different regions in Germany. As part of the accompanying process-based evaluation of the project, a survey was conducted among general practitioners and other specialists from these networks in order to find out how, in their view, collaboration with case managers can improve medical care of geriatric patients and contribute to closing possible gaps in primary care structures. Methods: The overall project RubiN, which was designed as a pragmatic controlled trial, compared patients from five practice networks where CCM has been implemented (intervention networks), with patients from three networks where the intervention was not taking place (control networks). Physicians of all eight participating practice networks were included in the present survey. The survey was conducted via a self-developed questionnaire. Results: A total of 111 physicians participated in the survey, 76 of whom were part of an intervention network and 35 part of a control network. The calculated response rate was 15.4% (networks reported a total of approx. 720 members). 91,1% of the participants from intervention networks, who had joined RubiN with their patients, reported satisfaction with their collaboration with case managers (n=41 of 45). 87.0% of the physicians from intervention networks stated that care for geriatric patients had improved as a result of their participation in the pilot study (n=40 of 46). When asked about the overall quality of care provided for their geriatric patients, the assessments of participants from intervention networks were more positive than those of the participants from control networks (MV 3.48 vs. 3.27 on a scale of 1=poor to 5=very good). Agreement with whether external case managers could provide certain services was higher among participants from intervention networks compared to participants from control networks. This was the case, in particular, of services related to medical data collection and test procedures. Overall, both comparison groups showed a high level of willingness to delegate tasks to a CCM. Discussion: Delegation of tasks to geriatric case managers seems to be more readily accepted by physicians in intervention networks than by their colleagues from the control networks, especially as regards medical assessment methods and advanced advisory tasks. The results suggest that interventions in this domain were able to convince physicians of the value that case managers can bring to medical practice and help resolve reservations and skepticism. Especially, the implemented CCM seemed to be an effective way of generating geriatric anamnestic data and fostering the flow of general patient-centered information. Conclusion: From the point of view of general practitioners and other specialists participating in the intervention, CCM has been successfully implemented in their practice networks and seems to be a worthwhile approach that will help provide better coordinated and more team-oriented care to their geriatric patients.

A flexible approach to measure care coordination based on patient-sharing networks

Care coordination for severe mental health disorders: an analysis of healthcare provider patient-sharing networks and their association with quality of care in a French region

Psychometric testing of the Care Dependency Scale in patients with heart failure and their caregivers

Using a Complex Network Methodology to Track, Evaluate, and Transform Fundamental Care

Measuring efficiency of community health centers: a multi-model approach considering quality of care and heterogeneous operating environments

Sustainable care coordination: a qualitative study of primary care provider, administrator, and insurer perspectives

Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to measure cancer patients' perception of care coordination

Measuring information exchange and brokerage capacity of healthcare teams

Care coordination across health care and social services sectors: patient and provider perspectives

Capturing the Spatial Relatedness of Long-Distance Caregiving: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Performance Measurement in the Health Care Sector: a Leader-Follower Network DEA Model based on Double Frontier Analysis

Collaboration in Health Care and Social Service Networks for Older Adults: Association With Health Care Utilization Measures

Care Coordination Processes in Transitional Care for Patients With Heart Failure: An Integrative Review Through a Social Network Lens

Exploring the impact of different multi-level measures of physician communities in patient-centric care networks on healthcare outcomes: A multi-level regression approach

The formation of physician patient sharing networks in medicare: Exploring the effect of hospital affiliation

Care coordination for CSHCN: associations with family-provider relations and family/child outcomes

Development and Initial Validation of the Caregiver Perceptions About Communication With Clinical Team Members (CAPACITY) Measure

Assessing Association Between Team Structure and Health Outcome and Cost by Social Network Analysis

Psychometric testing of the caring for the caregiver survey for healthcare providers

Care Coordination in Primary Care: Views of Clinicians and Clinic Leaders

[Coordinated primary care of older patients with complex needs. The perspective of family doctors in the light of a case management project within practice networks of independent physicians in Germany]