Abstract:Background Ambulatory Health Care Networks (Amb-HCN) are circuits of patient referral and counter-referral that emerge, explicitly or spontaneously, between doctors who provide care in their offices. Finding a meaningful analytical representation for the organic and hierarchical functioning of an Amb-HCN may have managerial and health policymaking implications. We aimed to characterize the structural and functional topology of an Amb-HCN of a private health insurance provider (PHIP) using objective metrics from graph theory. Methods This is a cross-sectional quantitative study with a secondary data analysis study design. A Social Network Analysis (SNA) was conducted using office visits performed between April 1, 2021 and May 15, 2022, retrieved from secondary administrative claim databases from a PHIP in Belo Horizonte, Southeastern Brazil. Included were beneficiaries of a healthcare plan not restricting the location or physician caring for the patient. A directional and weighted network was constructed, where doctors were the vertices and patient referrals between doctors, within 7–45 days, were the network edges. Vertex-level SNA measures were calculated and grouped into three theoretical constructs: patient follow-up (aimed at assessing the doctor’s pattern of patient follow-up); relationship with authorities (which assessed whether the doctor is an authority or contributes to his or her colleague’s authority status); and centrality (aimed at positioning the doctor relative to the network graph). To characterize physician profiles within each dimension based on SNA metrics results, a K-means cluster analysis was conducted. The resulting physician clusters were assigned labels that sought to be representative of the observed values of the vertex metrics within the clusters. Findings Overall, 666,263 individuals performed 3,863,222 office visits with 4,554 physicians. A total of 577 physicians (12.7%) had very low consultation productivity and contributed very little to the network (i.e., about 1.1% of all referrals made or received), being excluded from subsequent doctor profiles analysis. Cluster analysis found 951 (23.9%) doctors to be central in the graph and 1,258 (31.6%) to be peripheral; 883 (22.2%) to be authorities and 266 (6.7%) as seeking authorities; 3,684 (92.6%) mostly shared patients with colleagues, with patient follow-up intensities ranging from weak to strong. Wide profile dispersion was observed among specialties and, more interestingly, within specialties. Non-primary-care medical specialties (e.g., cardiology, endocrinology etc.) were associated with central profile in the graph, while surgical specialties predominated in the periphery, along with pediatrics. Only pediatrics was associated with strong and prevalent (i.e., low patient sharing pattern) follow-up. Many doctors from internal medicine and family medicine had unexpectedly weak and shared patient follow-up profiles. Doctor profiles exhibited pairwise relationships with each other and with the number of chronic comorbidities of the patients they treated. For example, physicians identified as authorities were frequently central and treated patients with more comorbidities. Ten medical communities were identified with clear territorial and specialty segregation. Conclusions Viewing the Amb-HCN as a social network provided a topological and functional representation with potentially meaningful and actionable emerging insights into the most influential actors and specialties, functional hierarchies, factors that lead to self-constituted medical communities, and dispersion from expected patterns within medical specialties.

The formation of physician patient sharing networks in medicare: Exploring the effect of hospital affiliation

Physician patient-sharing networks and the cost and intensity of care in US hospitals

The Role of Organizational Affiliations in Physician Patient-Sharing Relationships

Beyond patient-sharing: Comparing physician- and patient-induced networks

Patient-Sharing Networks of Physicians and Health Care Utilization and Spending Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Physician patient-sharing relationships and healthcare costs and utilization in China: social network analysis based on health insurance data

Physician Networks and Ambulatory Care-sensitive Admissions

303 Social Network Analysis of Patient Sharing Among Providers: Implications for Analyzing Disparities in Cancer Screening

Exploring the impact of different multi-level measures of physician communities in patient-centric care networks on healthcare outcomes: A multi-level regression approach

Effect of physician collaboration network on hospitalization cost and readmission rate

Analysis of the U.S. Patient Referral Network

Team Relationships and Performance: Evidence from Healthcare Referral Networks

Federated Patient Hashing.

Does hospital cooperation increase the quality of healthcare?

The role of electronic health record developers in hospital patient sharing

On Designing of a Low Leakage Patient-Centric Provider Network

The Building Blocks of Interoperability. A Multisite Analysis of Patient Demographic Attributes Available for Matching.

Effects of affiliation network membership on hospital quality and financial performance

Interoperability among hospitals treating populations that have been marginalized

Representation of the hierarchical and functional structure of an ambulatory network of medical consultations through Social Network Analysis, with an emphasis on the role of medical specialties

Ancillary Cost Implications of Physicians Multisiting and Inter‐Organizational Collaboration During Healthcare Delivery