Abstract:The goal of this study was to gather and compare kinematic response and injury data on both female and male whole-body Post-mortem Human Surrogates (PMHS) responses to Underbody Blast (UBB) loading. Midsized males (50th percentile, MM) have historically been most used in biomechanical testing and were the focus of the Warrior Injury Assessment Manikin (WIAMan) program, thus this population subgroup was selected to be the baseline for female comparison. Both small female (5th percentile, SF) and large female (75th percentile, LF) PMHS were included in the test series to attempt to discern whether differences between male and female responses were predominantly driven by sex or size. Eleven tests, using 20 whole-body PMHS, were conducted by the research team. Preparation of the rig and execution of the tests took place at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds (APG) in Aberdeen, MD. Two PMHS were used in each test. The Accelerative Loading Fixture (ALF) version 2, located at APG's Bear Point range was used for all male and female whole-body tests in this series. The ALF was an outdoor test rig that was driven by a buried explosive charge, to accelerate a platform holding two symmetrically mounted seats. The platform was designed as a large, rigid frame with a deformable center section that could be tuned to simulate the floor deformation of a vehicle during a UBB event. PMHS were restrained with a 5-point harness, common in military vehicle seats. Six-degree-of-freedom motion blocks were fixed to L3, the sacrum, and the left and right iliac wings. A three-degree-of freedom block was fixed to T12. Strain gages were placed on L4 and multiple locations on the pelvis. Accelerometers on the floor and seat of the ALF provided input data for each PMHS' feet and pelvis. Time histories and mean peak responses in z-axis acceleration were similar among the three PMHS groups in this body region. Injury outcomes were different and seemed to be influenced by both sex and size contributions. Small females incurred pelvis injuries in absence of lumbar injures. Midsized males had lumbar vertebral body fractures without pelvis injuries. And large females with injuries had both pelvis and lumbar VB fractures. This study provides evidence supporting the need for female biomechanical testing to generate female response and injury thresholds. Without the inclusion of female PMHS, the differences in the injury patterns between the small female and midsized male groups would not have been recognized. Standard scaling methods assume equivalent injury patterns between the experimental and scaled data. In this study, small female damage occurred in a different anatomical structure than for the midsized males. This is an important discovery for the development of anthropomorphic test devices, injury criteria, and injury mitigating technologies. The clear separation of small female damage results, in combination with seat speeds, suggest that the small female pelvis injury threshold in UBB events lies between 4 - 5 m/s seat speed. No inference can be made about the small female lumbar threshold, other than it is likely at higher speeds and/or over longer duration. Male lumbar spine damage occurred in both the higher- and lower lower-rate tests, indicating the injury threshold would be below the seat pulses tested in these experiments. Large females exhibited injury patterns that reflected both the small female and midsized male groups - with damaged PMHS having fractures in both pelvis and lumbar, and in both higher- and lower- rate tests. The difference in damage patterns between the sex and size groups should be considered in the development of injury mitigation strategies to protect across the full population.

Using anthropometry-based scaling to predict responses across sex in reclined frontal impact sled tests

Scaling Approach in Predicting the Seatbelt Loading and Kinematics of Vulnerable Occupants: How Far Can We Go?

Comparison of small female occupant model responses with experimental data in a reclined posture

Feasibility study of a safe sled environment for reclined frontal deceleration tests with human volunteers

Adaptive restraint design for a diverse population through machine learning

Obesity and non-fatal motor vehicle crash injuries: sex difference effects

Biomechanical Responses and Injury Assessment of Post Mortem Human Subjects in Various Rear-facing Seating Configurations

Estimation of the Impact of Human Body Variation on Its Crash Behavior Using Machine Learning Methods

Analysis of experimental injuries to obese occupants with different postures in frontal impact

Effects of seat pan and pelvis angles on the occupant response in a reclined position during a frontal crash

Bedside drainage of abscesses with sonographic guidance in the desperately ill.

Injury risks and crashworthiness benefits for females and males: Which differences are physiological?

Hello, world! VIVA+: A human body model lineup to evaluate sex-differences in crash protection

Responses of the scaled pediatric human body model in the rear- and forward-facing child seats in simulated frontal motor vehicle crashes

A computational study of injury severity and pattern sustained by overweight drivers in frontal motor vehicle crashes

Impact responses and injury analyses of a three-year-old occupant seating in forward and rearward facing CRSs using different computational models

Developing a heuristic relationship to predict the spinal injury during vertical impact for autonomous vehicle and bio environment

1-Methylcyclopropene and ethylene as regulators of in vitro organogenesis in kiwi explants

Comparison of Adult Female and Male PMHS Pelvis and Lumbar Response to Underbody Blast

Identification of a novel transcription factor, ACF, in cultured avian fibroblast cells that interacts with a Marek's disease virus late gene promoter.

Sex-based differences in odds of motor vehicle crash injury outcomes