Thermodynamic modeling and analysis of cascade hydrogen refuelling with three-stage pressure and temperature for heavy-duty fuel cell vehicles
Hao Luo,Jinsheng Xiao,Pierre Bénard,Chengqing Yuan,Liang Tong,Richard Chahine,Yupeng Yuan,Tianqi Yang,Cenglin Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.060
IF: 7.2
2024-04-01
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Abstract:Recently, the development of heavy-duty fuel cell vehicles (HDFCVs) has received intense attention. Unlike the refuelling protocol of SAE J2601 for light-duty fuel cell vehicles, the SAE J2601-2 for HDFCVs does not propose a specific filling strategy but only specifies the limits that need to be observed for safety. Refuelling data for HDFCVs at hydrogen refuelling station (HRS) shows that refuelling parameters are often set conservatively, resulting in long refuelling time. To shorten the refuelling time, energy consumption and power demand of the cooling system, we establish a detailed three-stage pressure filling model to study the effects of pressure ramp rate (PRR), initial pressure, number of onboard tanks and precooling temperature on the filling time. Then, a three-stage temperature precooling method is proposed simultaneously, whose cooling energy and power of the heat exchanger are compared with the single-stage temperature precooling method. Research shows that three-stage and two-stage pressure filling can reduce the average pressure difference between the station-side and the vehicle-side storage tanks, thereby reducing the Joule-Thomson heat generated by the reduction valve throttling and the heat exchanger energy consumption. Increasing the PRR and initial pressure can significantly and directly shorten the filling time. Increasing the number of onboard tanks and decreasing precooling temperature have little effect on the filling time but reduce the final hydrogen temperature in the onboard tank, which is beneficial to increase the PRR further to shorten the filling time. Within the ambient temperature range set in this article, compared with the single-stage temperature precooling method, the three-stage temperature precooling method can reduce the maximum peak cooling power by 16.69%–17.38% without increasing the total cooling energy of the heat exchanger and onboard tank's final hydrogen temperature, reducing equipment investment in cooling systems. This research is significant for optimizing HRS design and operation strategies.
energy & fuels,electrochemistry,chemistry, physical