Unraveling Reactivity Descriptors and Structure Sensitivity in Low-Temperature NH 3 -SCR Reaction over CeTiO x Catalysts: A Combined Computational and Experimental Study
Bing Liu,Jie Liu,Lei Xin,Tao Zhang,Yuebing Xu,Feng Jiang,Xiaohao Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c00311
IF: 12.9
2021-06-10
ACS Catalysis
Abstract:Developing ceria-based NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR catalysts possessing excellent NO conversion, N<sub>2</sub> selectivity, and SO<sub>2</sub>-tolerance at low-temperatures remains a great challenge. Precisely regulating the surface structure of ceria-based NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR catalysts at the atomic scale is paramount to boosting catalytic performance. Herein, we carried out a combined computational and experimental study to rationally engineer the surface structure of CeTiO<i><sub>x</sub></i> NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR catalysts and to unravel the reactivity descriptors and structure sensitivity. DFT calculations indicate that the Ti-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> solid solution structure not only displays a lower activation barrier for the rate-determining step but also separates the SO<sub>2</sub> binding site and the catalytic active site, where the Ti dopant serves as a SO<sub>2</sub>-trapping site while Ce site neighboring Ti and O vacancy next-neighboring Ti act as the dominant active sites for NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR. These DFT calculation results successfully guided the design and synthesis of highly effective Ti-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> solid solution catalysts, which exhibit superior intrinsic activity and excellent SO<sub>2</sub>-resistant ability for low-temperature NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR reaction in comparison with the Ce-Ti catalysts containing an amorphous Ce-O-Ti structure and CeO<sub>2</sub>-TiO<sub>2</sub> interface structure. Both DFT calculations and in situ DRIFTS results validate that the NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR reaction on Ti-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> solid solution dominantly follows the Eley–Rideal mechanism. The combined DFT calculations, H<sub>2</sub>-TPR, NH<sub>3</sub>-TPD, and catalyst evaluation results reveal that <i>E</i><sub>H</sub>/<i>E</i><sub>NH<sub>3</sub></sub> and <i>E</i><sub>vac</sub> are the two key reactivity descriptors that determine the overall NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR reaction on Ce-Ti-based catalysts. A volcano-type relationship between NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation activity and <i>E</i><sub>H</sub>/<i>E</i><sub>NH<sub>3</sub></sub> and a strong linear correlation between N–O bond breaking activity and <i>E</i><sub>vac</sub> were established. The superior intrinsic NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR activity of Ti-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> solid solution originates from its moderate <i>E</i><sub>H</sub>/<i>E</i><sub>NH<sub>3</sub></sub> and <i>E</i><sub>vac</sub> values. The role of the Ti dopant in Ti-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> solid solution as a SO<sub>2</sub>-trapping site to protect the catalytic active sites from sulfation was unraveled based on TG, TPDC, and in situ DRIFTS characterizations and DFT calculations. The structure sensitivity of Ce-Ti catalysts in NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR reaction was analyzed based on the atomic coordination structure, and it was found that the four-coordinated tetrahedron-type Ti configuration in Ti-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> solid solution assures its superior catalytic performance.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acscatal.1c00311?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.1c00311</a>.Catalyst characterization method, optimized structures of NH<sub>3</sub>-SCR reaction on Ti-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> and CeO<sub>2</sub>–TiO<sub>2</sub> interface (Figures S1–S7), catalyst evaluation under a high GHSV value of 90,000 h<sup>–1</sup> (Figure S8), SO<sub>2</sub><b>+</b> H<sub>2</sub>O resistance test (Figure S9), pyridine-adsorbed FTIR and in situ DRIFTS (Figures S10 and S11), correlation between <i>E</i><sub>H</sub> and <i>E</i><sub>vac</sub> (Figure S12), NO conversion and N<sub>2</sub> selectivity on the TiO<sub>2</sub>/CeO<sub>2</sub> catalyst (Figure S13), XPS spectra (Figure S14), in situ DRIFTS under SO<sub>2</sub> conditions (Figure S15), BET surface area and pore structure results (Table S1), and comparison of SO<sub>2</sub>-tolerance with the literature (Table S2) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acscatal.1c00311/suppl_file/cs1c00311_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, physical