Abstract:The constructs of motivation (or needs, motives, etc.) to explain higher-order behavior have burgeoned in psychology. In this article, we critically evaluate such high-level motivation constructs that many researchers define as causal determinants of behavior. We identify a fundamental issue with this predominant view of motivation, which we called the black-box problem. Specifically, high-level motivation constructs have been considered as causally instigating a wide range of higher-order behavior, but this does not explain what they actually are or how behavioral tendencies are generated. The black box problem inevitably makes the construct ill-defined and jeopardizes its theoretical status. To address the problem, we discuss the importance of mental computational processes underlying motivated behavior. Critically, from this perspective, motivation is not a unitary construct that causes a wide range of higher-order behavior --- it is an emergent property that people construe through the regularities of subjective experiences and behavior. The proposed perspective opens new avenues for future theoretical development, i.e., the examination of how motivated behavior is realized through mental computational processes.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is that there is a "black - box problem" in the high - level motivation constructs (such as achievement motivation, need for belonging, etc.) currently used in psychology to explain complex behaviors. Specifically, the author believes that although these high - level motivation constructs seem to be able to well explain complex behaviors, they do not clearly explain their internal mechanisms or how they generate behaviors, resulting in theoretical ambiguity and imprecision. ### Main problems: 1. **Black - box problem**: High - level motivation constructs are regarded as the initial causes of behaviors, but their internal operating mechanisms are not described in detail. This makes these constructs "black boxes", that is, we don't know how they work internally. 2. **Inconsistent definitions**: Since high - level motivation constructs are defined by explaining specific behaviors, there is ambiguity and inconsistency in their definitions, and it is difficult to precisely define the specific meanings and differences of these constructs. 3. **Difficult causal inference**: When making causal inferences, due to the unclear definitions of high - level motivation constructs, researchers have difficulty determining which variables are internal attributes and which are external influencing factors, thus making causal relationship inferences difficult. ### Solutions: The author proposes that high - level motivation should be regarded as the result of psychological constructs, rather than the direct cause of behaviors. Specifically, high - level motivation is actually the result of underlying mental computational processes, and these computational processes are the factors that truly determine behaviors. In order to open this "black box", researchers need to further explore and reveal the specific mechanisms of these mental computational processes. For example, the author takes the "reward learning model" as an example to show how to explain the motivation construct of "need for competence" through information - seeking behavior. In this model, individuals form continuous information - seeking behaviors through computational processes such as evaluating knowledge gaps, calculating the expected reward values of information, selecting and integrating information. This behavior pattern can be regarded as a manifestation of "need for competence", although the model itself does not directly include the concept of "need for competence". ### Summary: The core objective of this paper is to criticize the use of high - level motivation constructs in current psychology and propose a new perspective, that is, regarding these constructs as the products of underlying mental computational processes. In this way, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the nature of motivation and provide new directions for future theoretical development.

A critique of motivation constructs to explain higher-order behavior: We should unpack the black box

Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making

Motivational dynamics of self-control

Motivation and social cognitive theory

Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism

Desires and Motivation: The Computational Rule, the Underlying Neural Circuitry, and the Relevant Clinical Disorders

A unified theoretical framework underlying the regulation of motivated behavior

The Cause-Effect Problem: Motivation, Ideas, and Popular Misconceptions

Decomposing the Motivation to Exert Mental Effort

A review and empirical comparison of motivation scoring methods: An application to self-determination theory

Metamotivation: The regulation of motivation in self-control

Revisiting the Self-Determination Theory-Motivating the Unmotivated

Four best-practice recommendations for improving the conceptualization and operationalization of motivational intensity: Reply to Kaczmarek and Harmon-Jones.

Pseudo‐mechanistic Explanations in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience

Beyond Intrinsic Motivation: The Role of Autonomous Motivation in User Experience

Navigating the complex terrain of motivated behavior: a bibliometric and neuroscientific perspective

Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century

Fundamental Motives Illuminate a Broad Range of Individual and Cultural Variations in Thought and Behavior

Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior

Hybridizing Motivational Strains: How Integrative Models Are Crucial for Advancing Motivation Science

Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers