A unified theoretical framework underlying the regulation of motivated behavior

Yu‐Been Kim,Young Hee Lee,Shee‐June Park,Hyung Jin Choi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202400016
2024-09-04
BioEssays
Abstract:This article suggests psychophysiological components to regulate behavior. (1) "need", an alarm regarding predicted deficiency. (2) "motivation", a driver initiates behavior. (3) "pleasure", a lesson based on the immediate outcome. (4) "utility", a lesson derived from the final outcome, allowing these algorithms to be updated based on experiences. To orchestrate behaviors for survival, multiple psychological components have evolved. The current theories do not clearly distinguish the distinct components. In this article, we provide a unified theoretical framework. To optimize survival, there should be four components; (1) "need", an alarm based on a predicted deficiency. (2) "motivation", a direct behavior driver. (3) "pleasure", a teacher based on immediate outcomes. (4) "utility", a teacher based on final delayed outcomes. For behavior stability, need should be accumulated into motivation to drive behavior. Based on the immediate outcome of the behavior, the pleasure should teach whether to continue the current behavior. Based on the final delay outcome, the utility should teach whether to increase future behavior by reshaping the other three components. We provide several neural substrate candidates in the food context. The proposed theoretical framework, in combination with appropriate experiments, will unravel the neural components responsible for each theoretical component.
biochemistry & molecular biology,biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?