Abstract:Males in many species develop disproportionately large weapons which often increase more quickly with body size in small than in large males. We used the stag beetle (Cyclommatus mniszechi) to investigate the energetic costs of maintaining male weapons. We showed that being heavier and larger and carrying oversized weapons are energetically costly in major males, which could constrain the exaggeration of their weapons. Males of many species develop disproportionately large weapons, and frequently the weapon size increases more quickly with body size in small than in large males—a trend often considered to result from the depletion of developmental resources limiting male weapon exaggeration. Based on the cost‐minimization hypothesis, a shallower weapon‐body size allometric slope in large than in small males could be selected for if the energetic maintenance costs of having oversized weapons increase faster in large than in small males. Whether males of different size groups that differ in the weapon‐body size allometric relationship also differ in the energetic costs of maintaining their weapons has not yet been investigated. Consequently, we studied this using the stag beetle (Cyclommatus mniszechi), in which males are larger in size and have larger mandibles than do females and are divided into two morphs: majors are larger and have longer mandibles than minors. In both male morphs, mandible size increases disproportionately with their body size, but it increases more quickly in minors than in majors. We measured the standard metabolic rate (SMR) of the three types of these beetles (the two male morphs and females) to investigate whether the energetic maintenance cost of carrying weapons differs among them. Body weight explained 80% of the variation in the SMR in the three types of beetles, and SMR increased more quickly with body weight in major males than in minor males or females. Weapon and body size also jointly explained approximately 80% of the variation in the SMR. Whereas SMR increased with body size in all three types of beetles (with a higher rate of increase in major males than in minor males or females), only the major males' SMR increased with weapon size. Overall, being heavier and larger and carrying oversized weapons are energetically costly in major males, something which could constrain the exaggeration of their weapons.

Energetically costly weaponry in the large morph of male stag beetles

Weapon allometry and shape variation in the Helm’s stag beetle ( Geodorcus helmsi)

Relationship between weapon size and six key behavioural and physiological traits in males of the European earwig

Is Diversification in Male Reproductive Traits Driven by Evolutionary Trade-Offs Between Weapons and Nuptial Gifts?

The evolution of positive allometry and exaggerated traits in a diverse beetle clade

Heterospecific interaction in two beetle species: Males with weapons decrease the reproductive success of species with weaponless males

Evolution of horn length and lifting strength in the Japanese rhinoceros beetle Trypoxylus dichotomus

Defining an intrasexual male weapon polymorphism in a New Zealand harvestman (Opiliones: Neopilionidae) using traditional and geometric morphometrics

Induction of male‐like mandibles in XX individuals of a stag beetle by gene knockdown of a feminizer gene transformer

The effects of reproduction on courtship, fertility and longevity within and between alternative male mating tactics of the horned beetle, Onthophagus binodis

Exaggerated evolution of male armaments via male-male competition

Weapon performance drives weapon evolution

The evolution of weaponry and aggressive behaviour in field crickets

Brains vs Brawn: Relative brain size is sexually dimorphic amongst weapon-bearing ruminants

Sexual size dimorphism affecting mate choice and reproduction in the pine sawyer beetle, Monochamus alternatus

Conditional reproductive strategy of male burying beetles, Nicrophorus nepalensis

Do exaggerated chelicerae function as weapons or genitalia in a long-jawed spider? Functional allometric analysis yields an answer

Morphological and functional analyses for investigation of sexually selected legs in the frog legged beetle Sagra femorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Nutrition and Ontogeny Influence Weapon Development in a Long-Lived Mammal

No size-dependent reproductive costs in male black scavenger flies (Sepsis cynipsea)

The Development and Evolution of Exaggerated Morphologies in Insects