Abstract:Disparities in outcomes across social groups pervade human societies and are of central interest to the social sciences. How people treat others is known to depend on a multitude of factors (e.g., others' gender, ethnicity, appearance) even when these should be irrelevant. However, despite substantial progress, much remains unknown regarding (i) the set of mechanisms shaping people's behavior toward members of different social groups and (ii) the extent to which these mechanisms can explain the structure of existing societal disparities. Here, we show in a set of experiments the important interplay between social perception and social valuation processes in explaining how people treat members of different social groups. Building on the idea that stereotypes can be organized onto basic, underlying dimensions, we first found using laboratory economic games that quantitative variation in stereotypes about different groups' warmth and competence translated meaningfully into resource allocation behavior toward those groups. Computational modeling further revealed that these effects operated via the interaction of social perception and social valuation processes, with warmth and competence exerting diverging effects on participants' preferences for equitable distributions of resources. This framework successfully predicted behavior toward members of a diverse set of social groups across samples and successfully generalized to predict societal disparities documented in labor and education settings with substantial precision and accuracy. Together, these results highlight a common set of mechanisms linking social group information to social treatment and show how preexisting, societally shared assumptions about different social groups can produce and reinforce societal disparities.

Talent and experience shape competitive social hierarchies

Know Your Place: Neural Processing of Social Hierarchy in Humans

Rank Preserving Preferences

Seeking structure in social organization: Compensatory control and the psychological advantages of hierarchy.

Toward a Unified Science of Hierarchy: Dominance and Prestige are Two Fundamental Pathways to Human Social Rank

Phase transition from egalitarian to hierarchical societies driven by competition between cognitive and social constraints

Limited Cognitive Abilities and Dominance Hierarchy

Increased sensitivity to social hierarchy during social competition versus cooperation

Self- and Other-Orientation in High Rank: A Cultural Psychological Approach to Social Hierarchy

Advances in understanding neural mechanisms of social dominance

Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies

The Evolution of Social Dominance II: Multi-Player Models

Group social rank is associated with performance on a spatial learning task

Face the Hierarchy: ERP and Oscillatory Brain Responses in Social Rank Processing

Reproductive skew, fitness costs, and winner-loser effects in social-dominance evolution

Existence of Hierarchies and Human's Pursuit of Top Hierarchy Lead to Power Law

The Almost Sure Evolution of Hierarchy Among Similar Competitors

Upholding the Social Hierarchy

The mouse that roared: neural mechanisms of social hierarchy.

Predicting Human Behavior Toward Members of Different Social Groups.

Studying personality and social structure