Abstract:Generic job-exposure matrices (JEMs) are often used in population-based epidemiologic studies to assess occupational risk factors when only the job and industry information of each subject is available. JEM ratings are often based on professional judgment, are usually ordinal or semi-quantitative, and often do not account for changes in exposure over time. We present an empirical Bayesian framework that combines ordinal subjective JEM ratings with benzene measurements. Our aim was to better discriminate between job, industry, and time differences in exposure levels compared to using a JEM alone. We combined 63 221 short-term area air measurements of benzene exposure (1954-2000) collected during routine health and safety inspections in Shanghai, China, with independently developed JEM intensity ratings for each job and industry using a mixed-effects model. The fixed-effects terms included the JEM intensity ratings for job and industry (both ordinal, 0-3) and a time trend that we incorporated as a b-spline. The random-effects terms included job (n = 33) and industry nested within job (n = 399). We predicted the benzene concentration in two ways: (i) a calibrated JEM estimate was calculated using the fixed-effects model parameters for calendar year and JEM intensity ratings; (ii) a job-/industry-specific estimate was calculated using the fixed-effects model parameters and the best linear unbiased predictors from the random effects for job and industry using an empirical Bayes estimation procedure. Finally, we applied the predicted benzene exposures to a prospective population-based cohort of women in Shanghai, China (n = 74 942). Exposure levels were 13 times higher in 1965 than in 2000 and declined at a rate that varied from 4 to 15% per year from 1965 to 1985, followed by a small peak in the mid-1990s. The job-/industry-specific estimates had greater differences between exposure levels than the calibrated JEM estimates (97.5th percentile/2.5th percentile exposure level, R-BG(95B): 20.4 versus 3.0, respectively). The calibrated JEM and job-/industry-specific estimates were moderately correlated in any given year (Pearson correlation, r(p) = 0.58). We classified only those jobs and industries with a job or industry JEM exposure probability rating of 3 (> 50% of workers exposed) as exposed. As a result, 14.8% of the subjects and 8.7% of the employed person-years in the study population were classified as benzene exposed. The cumulative exposure metrics based on the calibrated JEM and job-/industry-specific estimates were highly correlated (r(p) = 0.88). We provide a useful framework for combining quantitative exposure data with expert-based exposure ratings in population-based studies that maximized the information from both sources. Our framework calibrated the ratings to a concentration scale between ratings and across time and provided a mechanism to estimate exposure when a job/industry group reported by a subject was not represented in the exposure database. It also allowed the job/industry groups' exposure levels to deviate from the pooled average for their respective JEM intensity ratings.

Optimization of benzene exposure risk assessment: An integrated approach utilizing internal and external concentrations with a focus on biomarkers S-PMA & t, t-MA

Leukemia risk assessment of exposure to low-levels of benzene based on the linearized multistage model

Occupational health risk assessment of the benzene exposure industries: a comprehensive scoring method through 4 health risk assessment models

Using Urinary Biomarkers to Estimate the Benzene Exposure Levels in Individuals Exposed to Benzene

Health Risk Assessment for Benzene Occupational Exposure Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model and Dose-Response Model

The prediction of occupational health risks of benzene in the printing industry through multiple occupational health risk assessment models

Occupational hazard risk assessment of workers exposed to benzene in a petrochemical enterprise in Shanghai, China

Biomarkers of occupational benzene exposure: A Systematic Review to estimate the exposure levels and individual susceptibility at low doses

Combining a job-exposure matrix with exposure measurements to assess occupational exposure to benzene in a population cohort in Shanghai, China

External Exposure to BTEX, Internal Biomarker Response, and Health Risk Assessment of Nonoccupational Populations Near a Coking Plant in Southwest China

Study on Health Risk Assessment for Benzene-Exposed Workers by Physiologically Based Toxicokinetic Model and Dose-Response Model

Methodological study of occupational chemical exposure assessment——a case study on benzene

Benchmark Dose Estimation for Benzene-Exposed Workers in China: Based on Quantitative and Multi-Endpoint Genotoxicity Assessments

Health Risk Assessment for Inhalation Exposure to Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether at Petrol Stations in Southern China

Benchmark dose estimation among benzene-exposed workers in China: Based on quantitative multi-endpoint genotoxicity assessments

MCSim-Based Occupational Health Risk Assessment on Benzene

Occupational Exposure Assessment and Carcinogenic Risk Simulation in Benzene Workers

Occupational hazards and risk assessment of benzene-related enterprises in yangzhou city from 2014 to 2018

Occupational Health Risk Assessment of Benzene, Toluene, and Xylene in Shanghai.

The prediction of occupational health risks of n-Hexane in small and micro enterprises within China's printing industry using five occupational health risk assessment models

Assessment of Industry-Induced Urban Human Health Risks Related to Benzo[a]pyrenebased on a Multimedia Fugacity Model: Case Study of Nanjing, China