Methodological study of occupational chemical exposure assessment——a case study on benzene

Hayden Wing,Jacques Oosthuizen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2007.03.019
2007-01-01
Abstract:Purpose To establish three methods for the assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals and compare their validity and feasibility. Methods Based on the historical information of benzene concentrations in a rubber factory, three methods, i. e. , data method (DM) , phase method (PM) and Bayesian statistics method (BM) were used to assess the exposure levels of workers. For the DM, historical measurements of benzene concentration in the air of the factory were grouped based on similar exposure groups (SEG). For the PM, the average level of benzene was used according to SEG and similar exposure phase (SEP). For the BM, Bayesian statistics physical model and expertise was introduced. TWA8 was calculated using these three methods respectively. The assessed exposure levels were compared with the field measurements. Results A total of 515 area historical data of benzene were obtained from 1964 to 2003. The three working stations with the highest levels assessed by those three methods were the same. The results of DM were unstable and most of them were higher than those of the other two methods. Area concentrations of 8 work stations and personal levels of 9 job titles were measured in current field surveys. The DM, PM, BM had respectively 3,4,7 work stations and 6,6,7 job titles that had estimations insignificant different from the field measurements. Conclusions Exposure levels assessed by BM were the closest to the measurements in spot, with PM the next, and DM the least.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?