Abstract:The BMD reference curve is the reference value used for diagnosing osteoporosis and assessing bone mass changes. Its accuracy would affect the correctness of T -score and Z -score values and thus the reliability of diagnostic results. In this paper, we report the use of a new method, a Cartesian coordinate numeration system, to establish BMD reference curves at different skeletal sites in women. In a reference population of 3,919 women ranging in age from 5–85 years, we used the dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone densitometer to measure BMD at the posteroanterior spine (PA; vertebrae L1–L4), followed by a paired PA/lateral spine scan of the vertebral bodies of L2–L4, expressed in g/cm 2 and g/cm 3 , and of the hip and forearm. We chose the cubic regression model to best fit BMD curves that varied with age at different skeletal sites. We then referred the BMD of the fitting curves established by the method of the coordinate numeration system as reference curves, compared them to BMD reference curves derived from the fitting curve equation or age cross-section, and calculated the deflection degrees of the BMD reference curves acquired from the fitting curve equation. At the PA spine, lateral spine (expressed in g/cm 3 ), femoral neck, Ward’s triangle and radius + ulna ultradistal, the reference curves calculated from the equation were significantly lower than those confirmed by the method of the coordinate numeration system; whereas, at the lateral spine (expressed in g/cm 2 ), total hip, and radius + ulna 1/3 sites, the reference curves derived from the equation were markedly higher than those acquired from the coordinate numeration system. The differences in the two kinds of reference curves calculated by these two different methods gradually increased along with the increment in ages of the women. At the peak value of the reference curves, the BMD calculated from the equation deflected from 2.02% to −10.0% from the BMD acquired from the coordinate numeration system at different skeletal sites, and from 21.5% to −121.8% until the age of 85 years. The highest positive deflection of 65.2% existed at the lateral spine (expressed in g/cm 2 ) and the lowest positive deflection of 21.5% at the total hip. The maximum negative deflection of −121.8% was at the radius + ulna ultradistal, and the minimum negative deflection of −32.6% at the PA spine. The BMD curve acquired from age cross-section was highly positive compared with the one derived from the coordinate numeration system ( r =0.955–0.985 p =0.000) with no significant difference between them. Various analysts used such a method to obtain the coefficient of variance (CV) in BMD precision on each curve that was from 0.05–0.19%. Our study shows that the Cartesian coordinate numeration system is an accurate, precise and reliable method and can serve to reveal the serious drawbacks of using the fitting curve equation to calculate BMD. The BMD reference curves established by this coordinate numeration system maintained the authenticity of the fitting curve, whereas, using the fitting curve equation to obtain BMD reference curves at different skeletal sites led to distortion, and resulted in false increases or decreases in T -score and Z -score values.

Estimating Lumbar Spine Least Significant Change for Fewer Than Four Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

The distribution of bone mass in the lumbar vertebrae: are we measuring the right target?

Assessing Change in Spine Bone Density from Different Numbers and Combinations of Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Bone Mineral Density Monitoring in Contiguous versus Non-Contiguous Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Fracture Risk Associated with Different Numbers and Combinations of Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Lumbar spine densitometry in people with spinal cord injury: Investigation of potential sources of errors

Contributions of Clinical and Technical Factors to Longitudinal Change in Trabecular Bone Score and Bone Density: A Registry‐Based Individual‐Level Analysis

"The least significant change on bone mineral density scan increased in patients with higher degrees of obesity"

Accuracy of Phantomless Calibration of Routine Computed Tomography Scans for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in the Spine Clinic

Quantitative CT for Preoperative Assessment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: The Unique Impact of L4 Bone Mineral Density on Single-Level Disease

Sex differences in the accuracy of vertebral bone quality score assessing bone density in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion

Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Apparent Density in Children: Results from the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study

Developing Cut-off Values for Low and Very Low Bone Mineral Density at the Thoracic Spine Using Quantitative Computed Tomography

Bone Mineral Density at the Ankle Measured with Quantitative CT (QCT)

Characteristics Of The Dxa Measurements In Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion For Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Analysis Of Over 1000 Patients

Establishment of BMD reference curves at different skeletal sites in women, using a Cartesian coordinate numeration system

Correction of QCT Vbmd Using MRI Measurements of Marrow Adipose Tissue

Contribution of the vertebral posterior elements in anterior-posterior DXA spine scans in young subjects

Vertebral Bone Quality Score Provides Preoperative Bone Density Assessment for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: a Retrospective Study

The Accurate Relationship Between Spine Bone Density and Bone Marrow in Humans

Differences of BMD Between Lumbar Vertebrae Measured by QCT and DXA