Abstract:The BMD reference curve is the reference value used for diagnosing osteoporosis and assessing bone mass changes. Its accuracy would affect the correctness of T -score and Z -score values and thus the reliability of diagnostic results. In this paper, we report the use of a new method, a Cartesian coordinate numeration system, to establish BMD reference curves at different skeletal sites in women. In a reference population of 3,919 women ranging in age from 5–85 years, we used the dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone densitometer to measure BMD at the posteroanterior spine (PA; vertebrae L1–L4), followed by a paired PA/lateral spine scan of the vertebral bodies of L2–L4, expressed in g/cm 2 and g/cm 3 , and of the hip and forearm. We chose the cubic regression model to best fit BMD curves that varied with age at different skeletal sites. We then referred the BMD of the fitting curves established by the method of the coordinate numeration system as reference curves, compared them to BMD reference curves derived from the fitting curve equation or age cross-section, and calculated the deflection degrees of the BMD reference curves acquired from the fitting curve equation. At the PA spine, lateral spine (expressed in g/cm 3 ), femoral neck, Ward’s triangle and radius + ulna ultradistal, the reference curves calculated from the equation were significantly lower than those confirmed by the method of the coordinate numeration system; whereas, at the lateral spine (expressed in g/cm 2 ), total hip, and radius + ulna 1/3 sites, the reference curves derived from the equation were markedly higher than those acquired from the coordinate numeration system. The differences in the two kinds of reference curves calculated by these two different methods gradually increased along with the increment in ages of the women. At the peak value of the reference curves, the BMD calculated from the equation deflected from 2.02% to −10.0% from the BMD acquired from the coordinate numeration system at different skeletal sites, and from 21.5% to −121.8% until the age of 85 years. The highest positive deflection of 65.2% existed at the lateral spine (expressed in g/cm 2 ) and the lowest positive deflection of 21.5% at the total hip. The maximum negative deflection of −121.8% was at the radius + ulna ultradistal, and the minimum negative deflection of −32.6% at the PA spine. The BMD curve acquired from age cross-section was highly positive compared with the one derived from the coordinate numeration system ( r =0.955–0.985 p =0.000) with no significant difference between them. Various analysts used such a method to obtain the coefficient of variance (CV) in BMD precision on each curve that was from 0.05–0.19%. Our study shows that the Cartesian coordinate numeration system is an accurate, precise and reliable method and can serve to reveal the serious drawbacks of using the fitting curve equation to calculate BMD. The BMD reference curves established by this coordinate numeration system maintained the authenticity of the fitting curve, whereas, using the fitting curve equation to obtain BMD reference curves at different skeletal sites led to distortion, and resulted in false increases or decreases in T -score and Z -score values.

Establishment of BMD reference curves at different skeletal sites in women, using a Cartesian coordinate numeration system

Comparison of Spine and Femur Reference Data in Native Chinese Women from Different Regions of China

Radiographic Predictors for Bone Mineral Loss CORTICAL THICKNESS AND INDEX OF THE DISTAL FEMUR

Establisbment of Bone Mineral Density Reference Plots and Peaks for Different Skeletal Sites in Women

Establishment of BMD Reference Plots and Determination of Peak BMD at Multiple Skeletal Regions in Mainland Chinese Women and the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

Effect of the Bone Density and Standard Deviation of the Young People to the Prevalence of Osteoporosis

An Updated Reference For Calculating Bone Mineral Density T-Scores

Determination of Age-Specific Bone Mineral Density and Comparison of Diagnosis and Prevalence of Primary Osteoporosis in Chinese Women Based on Both Chinese and World Health Organization Criteria

Relationship of Body Surface Area with Bone Density and Its Risk of Osteoporosis at Various Skeletal Regions in Women of Mainland China

Age-related Bone Mineral Density, Bone Loss Rate, Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Reference Database of Women at Multiple Centers in China

Studies on the Standards for the Bone Mineral Density Measurement at Forearm Skeletal Sites in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

Establishment and Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Reference Databases Appropriate for Diagnosis and Evaluation of Osteoporosis in Chinese Women

Establishment of BMD Reference Databases for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Osteoporosis in Central Southern Chinese Men

Comparison of the Spine and Hip Bmd Assessments Derived from Quantitative Computed Tomography

Age-Related Bone Mineral Density, Accumulated Bone Loss Rate and Prevalence of Osteoporosis at Multiple Skeletal Sites in Chinese Women

Establishing Age-Adjusted Trabecular Bone Score Curves Using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Chinese Women and Men: a Cross-Sectional Study

Adjustment of DXA BMD Measurements for Anthropometric Factors and Its Impact on the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis

Correlation Between Bone Area Size and Bone Mineral Density in Females

Influence of young people's bone mineral densities and their standard deviations on detective rate of osteoporosis:Multicenter and large sample analyses

The Analysis on the Related Factors of Bone Mass Density and the Detectable Rate of Osteoporosis in the Middle Aged and Elderly Female

The Relationship Between Bone Turnover Markers and BMD Decreasing Rates in Chinese Middle-Aged Women.